Move Signature Service Trial with airSlate SignNow

Move signature service trial

foreign foreign continuation of the hearing on the election challenge present for the record are parties or representatives in a respective Council you have Mr Parikh still on the witness stand under oath we are ready to continue with response examination this will be by Miss Connor I believe thank you honor with the opportunity to streamline over the lunch break we have no further questions at this time thank you all done okay I have a very brief redirect no that is fine you get redirect I'm smiling because I have a lawyer characterizing something as grief excuse my smile but this is redirect Mr Olson you may proceed Mr Parikh Mr Liddy asked you some questions about duplicate ballots and kind of like hey if there was a shrink to fit that that was no big deal because the duplicate would be uh captured or accepted by the tabulator what happens during the duplication process the original ballot is examined another clean ballot is is set beside it and those the ballot is duplicating all those votes are transferred and verified in the duplicated duplication process could the image of a 19-inch image from the original be transpose onto a 20 inch ballot as the duplicated ballot yes in other words if you had a 19 inch image on 20 inch paper the original image and then the ballot is duplicated and run through the scan could the duplicated ballot be brought up to a 20 inch image yes it should be if the if the ballot was originally a 20 inch ballast the the blank ballot that they would bring to put the votes transfer the votes to would would be 20x so yes it would be it would be tabular it would necessarily be moved to a 20 inch image in order that's the only way it could be technically yes and at the point of duplication Anything Could Happen to alter or not the original ballot correct if you're duplicating a ballot yes what's to stop somebody from altering the ballot from its original objection your honor my life this is beyond the scope of direct and cross I believe he's also asking for new opinions that he never offers you know if I may Mr Lydia is the one who brought up duplication and that it was no big deal this is directly relevant his examination and implication that duplication means that no harm no foul I agree with you in terms of the scope of redirect um I'm a little concerned about Foundation that's right I'll go ahead and ask whatever questions yes I apologize but the duplication process is in title 16 it's a very important part of process I would never and have never characterize it as no big deal and I object his mischaracterization of my description of that important process not a problem so noted Mr Olsen you have another question please Mr Parikh Mr Liddy asked you if...