Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Set Up eSign in MacApp
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now. Discover the most user-pleasant experience with airSlate SignNow. Deal with all of your papers handling and revealing system digitally. Go from hand-held, paper-dependent and erroneous workflows to automatic, electronic and faultless. You can actually make, supply and indication any files on any product just about anywhere. Ensure that your important business cases don't move over the top.
Discover how to Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now. Adhere to the simple information to get going:
- Build your airSlate SignNow profile in mouse clicks or log on with your Facebook or Google profile.
- Take pleasure in the 30-working day free trial offer or pick a costs strategy that's ideal for you.
- Locate any authorized web template, develop on the internet fillable forms and discuss them securely.
- Use innovative capabilities to Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now.
- Indicator, personalize signing buy and acquire in-man or woman signatures 10 times speedier.
- Set up automatic reminders and receive notifications at every move.
Relocating your duties into airSlate SignNow is straightforward. What adheres to is a straightforward method to Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now, in addition to ideas to maintain your colleagues and associates for much better cooperation. Empower the employees using the greatest instruments to remain on the top of organization operations. Increase productivity and level your business faster.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
What's the weirdest photo on your phone?
Hmmm….That’s definitely one.She’s cute, okay? One day Kim Jennie you will be my girlfriend……..Relatable.This one made me laugh…Now here’s some pretty offensive memes I saved:When you aren’t lovin’ it anymore….That’s just creepy.
-
What are the best features of Microsoft Office 365?
Here’s a breakdown of some awesome Features Office 3651. Work Smarter, EverywhereAfter buying Office 365, you also gain access to its accompanying mobile apps and browser apps. This allows you to access their cloud service from any up to date web browser on your desktop or mobile device. Even better yet, you don’t have to install Office software on your computer to do this.The mobile app allows you to access all of your Office 365 subscriptions and Office products right from your smartphone or tablet; this includes Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Onenote, and more. Cut the cord and stop working on your PC only — download the Microsoft Office 365 mobile app to stay productive, even while on the go.2. Enjoy 50 GB of StorageEach Office 365 user receives a whopping 50 GB of storage with Exchange Online; this can be used to save emails, calendar events, task lists, meeting notes, contact information, and email attachments.You can save some more space in your mailbox by utilizing the OneDrive cloud storage feature to share attachments.Your OneDrive storage is also synced to your device, enabling you to work offline on files. As soon as you reconnect to the web, the newest versions of your documents will be automatically uploaded to your cloud storage. The new versions of your documents will also be sent to any other connected device, including your phone or tablet — nifty!3. Edit Documents with Real-Time Co-AuthoringCollaborate online and see changes your team makes to shared documents within your Office apps as they happen with the real-time co-authoring feature in Word. Save your file to OneDrive cloud storage or SharePoint so your team can access the document and make any necessary edits or updates. You can also share it directly from Word by utilizing a handily integrated sidebar. As the publisher and access-giver, you can edit accessibility settings at any time.With the improved version control that was rolled out with Office 2016 co-authoring, you can see which changes to the document were made by which contributor and when the update was made. You can also easily revert back to a previous version of the file whenever you need to.4. Connect with Co-WorkersYou may not have known this, but Office apps include a Skype in-app integration. You can use this feature to instant message your teammates, share your screen during meetings and have audio or visual conversations — without even exiting the Office apps you’re working in. You can continue Skype conversations even after you close your office apps via your desktop or mobile version of Skype. The best part? Your team will receive unlimited Skype minutes.Source: Microsoft5. Send Links, Not FilesIt’s time to move away from email attachments. It’s never been easier to share documents for co-authoring!Simply upload your file to Office 365’s cloud storage. Then, write your email via Outlook or the Outlook web app. Rather than attaching your document to the email, you can insert a link to the file on your cloud. Outlook will automatically allow email recipients to edit the document you wish to share. You can always change permissions on any document at your convenience.6. Convert OneNote Items into Outlook Calendar EventsEasily configure OneNote items to tasks within your Outlook calendar. You can also assign tasks to colleagues, complete with follow-up reminders and concise due dates. You can also transfer meeting notes taken in OneNote via email to your teammates, and add important details (date, location, and attendees) to their respective meeting.7. Use Your Mouse as a Laser Pointer during PowerPoint PresentationsWith only a simple keyboard shortcut (Ctrl + P), your mouse can be used as a laser pointer during your PowerPoint presentations. You can also use the “presenter mode” commands while using this feature.The laser pointer tool has been a nifty trick within older versions of the office apps for years; however, it was only recently integrated for touch-screen devices. All you have to do is hold down on your device’s screen, and the laser pointer will appear.8. Create a Power Map Using ExcelTurn data into a 3-D interactive map with Power Map, one of the many Power BI-enhanced data visualization features that Excel has to offer. It comes with three different filters: List, Range, or Advanced. The Power Map will help you not only convey your data more effectively, but also support your claims by creating a tangible story from the numbers.
-
What is the difference between a loan and an overdraft?
HiLoan :Loan refer to the fix amount of money borrow from a bank for fixed period of time with regular repayments.Overdraft Loan :An overdraft facility is the credit given to person or company on current account. The amount you withdraw can vary every day based on your requirement. It’s like a credit card, you can borrow as much as you need upto your credit limit.Difference between Loan & OverdraftOverdraft- In overdraft the interest rate is charged only on the overdraft amount borrowed not on the limit of the overdraft facility and in Loan, the interest is charged on the entire amount borrowed. The interest charged on Overdraft is higher than loans.An overdraft loan is for the short time and you cannot borrow large amount of money due to credit limits. A loan can be for a long time period like 5–30 years say and you can take large amount of funds.For taking overdraft the person should have a current account with the respective bank but in other hand there is no such pre-conditioned while taking loan.Interest in overdraft is calculating on daily basis but in loan, it is computed on a monthly basis.Payment option in overdraft facility will be made in a lump sum amount and can be closed anytime. while a loan is paid in Equated Monthly Instalments (EMI) and have to be paid within the fixed time period.Overdraft is good for short term expenses and loan is good for long period of time.I hope this will help you.Thank You
-
How does bitcoin work? Who actually pays for the mining done?
Approximately once every 10 minutes since January 3, 2009 at 18:15:05 UTC, one miner in the world has found/will find a valid Bitcoin block that meets the current difficulty requirements. When that happens, the block reward and the transaction fees will be distributed to the wallet(s) configured by that miner in that block. These two sources make up all of a miner’s income.Block rewards are the only way that new Bitcoins are min[t]ed. The block reward started at 50 BTC/block and halves every 210,000 blocks. This is why the current block reward is 12.5 BTC/block as of Sept 2017.Transaction fees for a block are the sum of the fees paid for all new transactions included in that block. For example, I might send you .5 BTC and specify a fee of .00004 BTC as incentive for miners to include that transaction in their block. The first miner to include that transaction in an accepted block will then earn that .00004 BTC in addition to the block reward and fees from other included transactions.Early on, transaction fees were a negligible source of miner income since there were very few transactions and the block reward was high. However, as the block reward diminishes and the number of transactions grows this trend will reverse and block rewards will become negligible and transaction fees will dominate earnings.Mining pools are another layer on top of this. Instead of the reward and fees going to a single miner, they instead have a number of miners pooling their efforts and splitting the rewards based on that pool's rules. In this way, if it would normally take you 10,000 years on average to find a block by yourself, you can instead join a mining pool and get small fractions of a block reward regularly based on your mining contribution and the pool's rules.Compare that to solo mining without a mining pool, where until you find a valid block you won't get a single Satoshi.
-
What evidence is there that Russian hackers tried to influence the US presidential election?
Before discussing evidence, it’s important to be clear that the assessment of the U.S. intelligence community is unanimous: Russia interfered with the election. It happened.The FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI all said so when they were run by Obama appointees, and they continue to say so now that they’re run by Trump appointees. DHS says so, too.Presidents, too. Obama said it. Bush said it. Trump said it. He tries to downplay it, but he said it. And his CIA Director and Secretary of State say they aren’t going to stop.And Congress, as well. Members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees from both parties have said it.That’s two branches of government, two political parties, partisans and civil servants; Republicans, Democrats, and dedicated professionals living and breathing national security every day.Outside the U.S. government, private sector companies specializing in computer forensics have said it, even those that compete with each other and have strong incentive to prove the others wrong. More on that shortly.To be as clear as possible before moving on, the FBI, CIA, and NSA, through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, published the following assessment:President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.So, we’re confident the Russians attempted “an influence campaign” to interfere with the 2016 U.S. election, but what form did this take?The effort was multi-pronged:Establishing contact with the Trump campaign and those receptive to Russian overtures.Hacking into Democratic servers and leaking stolen information.Organized trolling using Russian agents and bots to maximize the propaganda value of the leaked emails, spread disinformation, disrupt political discourse, foment anger and vitriol, support Trump messaging, etc.BsignNowing U.S. election systems, either for 2016 or to set up actions for future elections.Item #1 relates to the ongoing collusion investigation of contacts between Russia and the Trump team. That would be a whole answer on its own, and it’s not even necessary to show evidence of the Russian interference, so I’ll just offer this quick summary:At least 12 Trump associates had contacts with Russians during the campaign or transitionThere were at least 19 face-to-face interactions with Russians or Kremlin-linked figuresThere were at least 51 communications -- meetings, phone calls, email exchanges and more.This flies in the face of at least nine blanket denials from Trump world of any contacts with RussiaIf you want to read the details behind that, go ahead: By the numbers: The Trump orbit's contacts with Russians is a good start, or for a more in depth timeline: All the known times the Trump campaign met with RussiansThe majority of this answer will focus on #s 2, 3, and 4.Now that we’ve established what we know, we can move on to how we know it. That part gets a bit more complicated.Although all those U.S. government entities say so with high confidence, they can’t exactly “show their work” to the general public without telling the Russians all the ways they used to catch them. If they did, they would not only be telling them how to avoid detection in the future, but endangering the lives of human intelligence sources (our spies and assets) and the continued viability of any electronic or cyber intelligence sources, such as any vulnerabilities we’ve exploited in their systems.Usually, it’s not just the sources and methods that are kept secret but everything. Generally, the public doesn’t get told anything U.S. intelligence knows, except in serious situations, like when they discovered Russia’s previous management, the Soviet Union, was secretly installing nuclear missile sites 90 miles off the coast of Florida, a scary incident known as the Cuban Missile Crisis.In this case, when they decided to go public, they made two reports, but we only got to see the unclassified one, which leaves out the sensitive details about how we know what we know. Here’s how it’s explained in the report:“Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment that has been provided to the President and to recipients approved by the President.The Intelligence Community rarely can publicly reveal the full extent of its knowledge or the precise bases for its assessments, as the release of such information would reveal sensitive sources or methods and imperil the ability to collect critical foreign intelligence in the future.Thus, while the conclusions in the report are all reflected in the classified assessment, the declassified report does not and cannot include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence and sources and methods.Since they can’t tell us their evidence, any answer to this question on Quora will be missing the majority of the evidence.However, even without them spilling all their secrets, there’s quite a bit that’s publicly known. And the preceding two sentences taken together should underscore just how overwhelming the evidence must be.One last thing before diving in, a quick note of caution: Do not be confused by talk about “the dossier” or “the Nunes memo” as they have little to do with this.Ok, so here’s some of the evidence that’s publicly known:Democratic servers were hacked by Russians. Although the government isn’t willing to expose all their evidence for this, we have plenty.Let’s start with the strong forensic information from multiple private sector firms.The Democratic National Committee suspected something happened but wasn’t sure what, so they “called in CrowdStrike, a security firm that specializes in countering advanced network threats.”While the infiltration was very advanced, within just two hours CrowdStrike discovered reams of evidence that left little doubt that not only did the Russians hack them, but two different Russian agencies had.Knowing that this was a big claim, they published their evidence. Their report is pretty specific. It’s not that long but includes all sorts of technical details, including excerpts from the actual code, among other things. Feel free to read it if you want to get deeper into the weeds.It’s not just the company the Democrats hired saying so: “Two competing cybersecurity companies, Mandiant (part of FireEye) and Fidelis, confirmed CrowdStrike's initial findings that Russian intelligence indeed hacked the DNC.” Now, we’re up to three saying so.Then a fourth cyber security firm “examined the forensic data from the DNC hack themselves, and endorsed Crowdstrike’s conclusions.” This company you might’ve even heard of: Symantec.The U.S. government confirmed the findings as well. A separate report we’ll get into later reiterated many of the points raised by CrowdStrike, including when each of the Russian intelligence agencies they identified infiltrated the DNC (the hacks were done at different times).Part of the evidence is that CrowdStrike had seen these digital fingerprints before. They investigate 15,000 hacks every year, so when their software analyzes systems, it recognizes that certain sequences of actions taken form patterns that become a unique signature. Wired explains, “Every action at a system level on the DNC's computers was recorded and checked against CrowdStrike's bank of prior intelligence (the company processes 28 billion computer events a day).” There are “a handful of small but signNow tells: data exfiltrated to an IP address associated with the hackers; a misspelled URL; and time zones related to Moscow.”In other words, the companies are familiar with these hackers and know what to look for. Here’s a little blurb about how familiar they are with their modus operandi:“Security companies can tell you much more about these groups, their code, their infrastructures, and their methods. (The Finnish security firm F-Secure has an excellent 34-page write-up of [one of the Russian intelligence agency hacker groups], and FireEye has a deep dive into [the other Russian hacker group], among many other reports by different companies.) (PDF) From analysis of the dozens of malware packages used exclusively by these hackers, researchers can tell you that…“They’re usually compiled on machines with the language set to Russian.”“Both groups operate during working hours in Russia, and take Russian holidays off.”“Their targets are radically different from those of for-profit criminals hackers in Eastern Europe or anywhere else—no banks, no retailers with credit card numbers to steal—always governments, companies, journalists, NGOs, and other targets that the Russian government would be interested in.”One part of the hack involved tricking DNC employees with phony links that were used in previous hacks tied to Russia.As good as the Russians were at hacking, they made mistakes, during and after the hack. For example, they inadvertently left Russian-language metadata in the leaked files.Oops.There’s even Russian language error messages accidentally embedded due to the way they exported the docs. Crowdsourcing spotted that, not just the cyber firm. A Twitter user who used to work for British intelligence did some great analysis."error! invalid hyperlinks" in Russian... pic.twitter.com/T9jmLnNiKF— davi (((
-
What are the illnesses that can be reliably detected by odor?
Just analyze someone's breath, mucus, saliva, sweat or urine and diagnose whether they have diabetes, cancer, COPD, IBD, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), Tuberculosis (TB), or any other disease for that matter. Now that would be a seismic revolution in medicine. For one, fully non-invasive in complete contrast to the present-day staples, needles and blood draws, and the pain and fear they entail. Could also be done as often as possible, even when asleep or anesthetized during surgery, even in real-time, as point-of-care, i.e., truly portable and thus truly mobile. Underlying idea is the body's physiological emanations reliably communicate unique signatures of underlying diseases in the form of singular mixes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i.e., the human 'volatilome'. The reality, OTOH, is a sharp, painful thud since the ground reality is one where most of these possibilities remain not even remotely feasible in the near future.Volatilome historians point to the French chemist, Antoine Lavoisier, as the modern inspiration for diagnosis using exhaled breath (1). He showed the body produces and exhales carbon dioxide. In turn this became the basis for Capnography, monitoring the concentration pressure or partial pressure of carbon dioxide in respiratory gases, the most common breath test. Antiquated roots notwithstanding, using unique signatures from breath and other emanations for disease diagnosis still remains deep in research mode and far from much practical utility. A 2014 review lists a total of only 7 US FDA-approved breath-related tests (see below from 2).Obstacles To Widespread Non-invasive Sampling of Body Emanations For Disease DiagnosisI. Unlike Animal Olfaction, Human Technology's Remained Too Constrained In Choice Of What To AnalyzeDefault, standard analytical approach to sampling and analyzing compounds present in emanations is to rely on 'headspace' analysis (3, see below from 4), jargon that means sampling what is already in the gas phase, i.e., already volatile in the material, rather than attempt to extract compounds of interest from it.Problem is this can cut off too thin a slice of the pie. This shows up in the results since technical approaches continue to fail to mimic what animals do so effortlessly when they use smell to communicate, forage and assess the health of those around them. This brings us to animals and their remarkable capacity to sniff out disease so much so that anecdotal reports suggest they can even be far more accurate in diagnosing human diseases compared to human technologies.Two diseases with substantial research on animals successfully sniffing them out in humans are Skin Cancers by dogs and TB by Giant African pouched rats.IA. Dogs Can Spontaneously Detect Human Skin Cancer & Can Also Be Trained To Detect Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)In 1989, the Lancet published what is perhaps the first modern report of a dog sniffing out its owner's melanoma (See below from 5)In 2001, a follow-up anecdotal study (6) added two other case reports of dogs accurately sniffing out skin cancer lesions,One, a London, UK report on Parker, a pet labrador who sniffed it out on a 66 year old man's left thigh. The patient had developed an eczema patch there. Treated unsuccessfully by topical steroids and antifungals, it grew slowly over 18 years. In 1994, Parker became a family member. Around 1999, Parker started to persistently push his nose against the patient's trouser leg and sniff the lesion beneath it, i.e., could smell something about the lesion even through clothing. This induced the patient to re-consult his family physician. The lesion was excised in September 2000 and histology showed it to be a fully excised basal cell carcinoma. Once lesion was fully removed, Parker no longer showed interest in that area.The other, by George, a Florida, USA, K-9 unit schnauzer trained by his retired handler to recognize in vitro malignant melanoma samples. A local dermatologist had read the original 1989 Lancet case report and teamed up with the handler to see if such a result was repeatable with another dog. When George was introduced to a patient with several moles considered cancer-free, he went 'crazy' over one particular mole, which when excised confirmed 'early malignant disease'.Authors of this second case report speculated dogs might also be able to detect odors associated with specific diseases such as TB and Ebola.In 2012, The BMJ published a proof of principle study on Cliff, a 2 year old beagle trained to sniff out human Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remarkably accurately (7).Such reports have provoked more systematic studies, which conclude that dogs could detect unique odors emanating from human melanoma and other cancers (8, 9, 10).Problem is clinical scope for using dogs to diagnose diseases is limited given the costs, effort, space and time required to train sniffer dogs to detect various diseases (11).IB. Giant African Pouched Rats Can Be Trained To Reliably Detect Human Tuberculosis (TB)Used to diagnose lung TB in resource-poor settings, the antiquated microscopic Ziehl–Neelsen stain is a standard method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sputum (coughed up mucus). A few studies suggest trained Giant pouched rat are not just as sensitive and accurate but also able to process >50 times more samples per day compared to a lab technician, i.e., much more economical (12). The WHO recommends microscopists not analyze more than an average of 20 samples per day to minimize misdiagnoses (13) while two trained giant African pouched rats could signNow a total of 70 consensus results in 32 minutes over 2 sessions each. This means trained rats could screen larger populations in a much shorter time meaning faster TB diagnoses and hence potential for reduced TB transmission, i.e., a potentially enormous public health benefit.The video below shows how the Belgian social enterprise APOPO trains these rats in Tanzania to accurately diagnose TB from human samples.II. Inadequate Research Efforts To Deconstruct The Human VolatilomeClearly animals are able to smell broader, more complex mix of volatile chemicals that the most sophisticated chemical extraction techniques used in volatilome analysis miss (3). In order for technologies to be able to replicate what animals seem to do so effortlessly, research needs to systematically unravel the human volatilome and establish a reference base of what that looks like in health in order to be able to discern and diagnose cause of ill-health simply from analyzing someone's emanations.What compounds are present in normal breath, urine, skin emanations, saliva, blood and feces? A compendium of the healthy human volatilome was first described only in 2014 (14), meaning a foundational study has come along only in the very recent past. This study is foundational for the following reasons,It identified compounds in breath (874), urine (279), skin emanations (504), saliva (353), blood (130), feces (381).It classified these compounds by their CAS Registry Number (CAS), unique numerical identifier assigned to every chemical substance described in the published scientific literature.Hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers are routinely published on the human volatilome. Problem is there is as yet no standardization of procedures or data reporting. As a result, the literature is awash in duplicates.Does exhaled breath really have ~3000 different compounds? Umm, looks like it's less than a fourth of that.This 2014 paper (14) is thus the first step in the right direction, namely to consolidate, synthesize and whittle down published information into a potentially universal 'megatable' of compounds present in healthy human emanations.III. Too Much Technical Sensitivity Can Sometimes Be Too Much Of A Good ThingIterations over decades have vastly improved sensitivity of state-of-the-art volatilome analysis methods like Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS), Selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) and other techniques such that they can easily measure ~1000 compounds.Problem is most volatilome studies investigate a handful of subjects, not the thousands necessary to validate variables that are different between those with or without diseases.One review (1) suggests number of subjects should be >5X the number of analytes measured, clearly something that adds prohibitive cost to such studies but not doing so increases chances for what they call 'voodoo correlations', an issue compounded by dividing test populations further into sub-groups.Volatilome data are also not standardized, neither are the procedures (1, 3, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). This makes meta-analyses, i.e., comparison of data across multiple studies, well-nigh impossible.As with so many topics in biomedical research, human volatilome studies have heretofore paid scant attention to human Microbiota (19), how it shapes the human volatilome and how that process not only differs between health and disease but also yields different outcomes, i.e., different volatile signatures (1, 3).That said, there are several diseases with candidate volatile biomarkers that await final validation (see tables below from 20). The sky's very much the limit for diagnosing diseases through their distinctive odors.Bibliography1. Amann, Anton, et al. "The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva." Journal of breath research 8.3 (2014): 034001.2. Amann, Anton, et al. "Analysis of exhaled breath for disease detection." Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 7 (2014): 455-482.3. Kimball, Bruce A. "Volatile metabolome: problems and prospects." (2016). http://www.future-science.com/do...4. Restek, A. "Technical Guide for Static Headspace Analysis Using GC." Restek Corp (2000): 11-12. http://www.restek.com/pdfs/59895...5. Williams, Hywel, and Andres Pembroke. "Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic?." The Lancet 333.8640 (1989): 734.6. Church, John, and Hywel Williams. "Another sniffer dog for the clinic?." The Lancet 358.9285 (2001): 930. http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/jo...7. Bomers, Marije K., et al. "Using a dog’s superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study." (2012): e7396. http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/3...8. Pickel, Duane, et al. "Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma." Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89.1 (2004): 107-116. http://sniffoutcancer.org/images...9. Moser, Emily, and Michael McCulloch. "Canine scent detection of human cancers: a review of methods and accuracy." Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 5.3 (2010): 145-152. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...10. Jezierski, Tadeusz, et al. "Study of the art: canine olfaction used for cancer detection on the basis of breath odour. Perspectives and limitations." Journal of breath research 9.2 (2015): 027001. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...11. Buljubasic, Fanis, and Gerhard Buchbauer. "The scent of human diseases: a review on specific volatile organic compounds as diagnostic biomarkers." Flavour and Fragrance Journal 30.1 (2015): 5-25.12. Mgode, Georgies F., et al. "Diagnosis of tuberculosis by trained African giant pouched rats and confounding impact of pathogens and microflora of the respiratory tract." Journal of clinical microbiology 50.2 (2012): 274-280. Diagnosis of Tuberculosis by Trained African Giant Pouched Rats and Confounding Impact of Pathogens and Microflora of the Respiratory Tract13. World Health Organization, et al. "Management of tuberculosis: training for district TB coordinators." (2005). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre...14. de Lacy Costello, Ben, et al. "A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body." Journal of breath research 8.1 (2014): 014001. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...15. Pereira, Jorge, et al. "Breath analysis as a potential and non-invasive frontier in disease diagnosis: an overview." Metabolites 5.1 (2015): 3-55. Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview16. Boots, Agnes W., et al. "Exhaled molecular fingerprinting in diagnosis and monitoring: validating volatile promises." Trends in molecular medicine 21.10 (2015): 633-644. https://www.breathcloud.org/wp-c...17. Bikov, Andras, Zsófia Lázár, and Ildiko Horvath. "Established methodological issues in electronic nose research: how far are we from using these instruments in clinical settings of breath analysis?." Journal of breath research 9.3 (2015): 034001.18. Scarlata, Simone, et al. "Exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose in respiratory diseases." Expert review of molecular diagnostics 15.7 (2015): 933-956.19. Dietert, Rodney Reynolds, and Ellen Kovner Silbergeld. "Biomarkers for the 21st century: listening to the microbiome." Toxicological Sciences (2015): kfv013. Listening to the Microbiome20. Kataoka, Hiroyuki, et al. "Noninvasive analysis of volatile biomarkers in human emanations for health and early disease diagnosis." Bioanalysis 5.11 (2013): 1443-1459. https://www.researchgate.net/pro...Thanks for the R2A, Jonathan Brill.
-
Can I withdraw cash by cheque from an ATM?
Unfortunately, the answer is no. You cannot withdraw cash from an ATM machine by using a cheque. You need your debit card or credit card in order to be able to withdraw cash from the ATM machine. However, you are able to add funds to your debit card and bank account by depositing a cheque through the ATM machine but such ATM must be an ATM that belongs to your bank or that is associated with your bank because any ATM will either not worth or the check might get lost.You can also withdraw cash from your bank account by showing up in person to your bank location and fill out a withdraw slip and then present it to the bank teller.However, you must show an official identification card with your picture as proof of identity in order to use this option.
-
Did Indian Air Force really shoot down Pakistan air force F-16 on Feb 27 2019?
Did Indian Air Force really shoot down a PAF F-16? Let's take a look at the events objectively. IAF says (and it is IAF that is saying it, and that too an Air Vice Marshal, and not some politician or a bureaucrat, as the repercussion should this turn out to be a hoax will be devastating for any Indian uniformed personal!) that they did shoot a F-16, and it was seen going down by their men on the ground. And as a proof of F-16 presence, they have exhibited parts of a missile which they say only F-16s have the ability to fire in the PAF. But, all these details are not at all interesting!What is interesting though, is the PAF’s claim that they did not use F-16s at all in this operation! That is a huge statement, because on 26.02.2019, 12 IAF Mirage-2000 fighters flew 120km inside Pakistani territory, bombed and went back safely-and not one PAF aircraft including the JF-17s or the F-16s could do anything to stop them or bring at least one of them down! And so, on the next day when they wanted to retaliate by violating Indian Air Space, they decided to leave their best planes behind-and instead decided they will use the Chinese discarded JF-17s and go into a hostile airspace where the far superior Sukhoi-30MKIs, Mig-29s and the afore mentioned Mirage-2000s are flying around, and show them the fifth generation capabilities of the JF-17s. Yes, now that does sound like Paksitani logic! :D .And then there is the mysterious case of the 3 Indian pilots that Pakistan Army arrested-of course, unfortunately two of whom vanished into thin air! :) . I mean, anybody who know numbers should be able to count! That is, two pilots is not equal to three pilots which is not equal to the one pilot, which was ultimately what was settled upon. How could anybody mess that up? So, there could be substance in the IAF story that a F-16 was shot down, and it could be those pilot(s) were initially mistaken as IAF pilots by the brilliant minds in Pakistan, and hence the claim of having three pilots in custody!Now, for all those pure-hearted peace lovers who do not believe the IAF version of the story, there is always the much simpler Pakistani version-which is:Pakistan: “We shot down two IAF fighter jets, a Mig-21 and a Sukhoi-30MKI. But since we are a peace loving country we are returning the Mig-21 pilot to India.”Sane Person: “But what of the other pilot(s) still in your custody?”Pakistan: “Well since India did not ask for them, why should we return them?”Sane Person: “Why did India not ask for them?”Pakistan: “Because that would effectively mean having to acknowledge that they lost two fighters, including one superior Sukhoi-30MKI to a JF-17!”Sane Person: “But why then is Pakistan not producing those pilot(s), and revealing to the World that India did loose a Mig-21 and Sukhoi-30MKI or even three Mig-21s to JF-17s-and take credit for it?”Pakistan: “Well, we are simple minded peace loving people. Why would we want to embarrass our brothers in India?”Have to say, can't argue with that. Can we? :DMaybe down the line, say 10 years later, much like how Pervez Musharraf finally admitted that Ajmal Kasab, the lone captured terrorist from Mumbai 2008 was indeed a Pakistani, we will see Nobel laureate Imran Khan, after his fallout with the establishment, somewhere abroad, most probably London, finally reveal 'The Mysterious Case Of The Missing Pilots'! Personally for me, 'The Mysterious Case Of The Missing Pilots' is ample proof that the Pakistani version is not accurate!
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How to create electronic signature image?
How to sign electronically a contract in pdf?
Get more for Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now
- Help Me With Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- How To Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- How Can I Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- Can I Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- How Do I Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- How Do I Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- How To Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
- Help Me With Electronic signature Tennessee Police Presentation
Find out other Draw Electronic signature Presentation Now
- Default having been made in the payment of the indebtedness secured by that certain form
- Hereinafter referred to as grantor does hereby remise release quitclaim form
- Order setting day form
- Full text of ampquotthelawyersandclerksassistantpdf pdfy form
- Guardian status report final probate court of mobile county form
- Instructions for probate with a will co courts form
- In the matter of the estate of court use only deceased form
- Certificate to the probate of will form
- Liles box probate records lamar county alabama form
- Estate notice personal representatives notice to file claims form
- Proceeding international conference on electronic law form
- Patch properties mcmaster physics and astronomy yumpu form
- Case file coversheet form
- Order of trial form
- Code of criminal procedure chapter 38 evidence in criminal form
- List of witnesses form
- Chapter 3 what you need to know about evidence form
- Richardson v alabama state bd of educ 935 f2d 1240 form
- In the district court of butler county alabama form
- Criminal felony procedure jefferson county district attorney form