Remove Electronic signature Document Mac

Ok, It is March 23, 2016 and I am writing this answer. My money is on two characters, Thea and Roy. As most of the answers have already pointed out why one of these two could be in the grave, I'll tell why the others can't be. Let's have a look:**Spoilers ahead, read at your own risk**Felicity - Already shown to be alive after the graveyard scene in Episode 10. No further discussion.John Diggle - Watch Legends of Tomorrow Episode 6. Connor Hawke a.k.a John Diggle Jr says "My father died because I couldn't save him, I don't deserve his name". Since Diggle Jr. isn't born as yet, there is no way John is the one in the grave.Laurel - Minimal possibility, because I have read somewhere that Black Canary is going to be an important part of Arrow-verse in the seasons to come. The makers of the show have got bigger plans for this character. Since it can't happen in flashbacks, so I highly doubt whether they would kill off Laurel's character.Quentin - Could be. But I don't think that Barry would travel to Star City amidst all that is going on with Zoom, just to support Oliver after the death of a less important character. Lyla - This has a good possibility. Number 3 on my list of potentials. Both Oliver and Felicity are close to her, so it makes sense that both of them are distraught by her death. Oliver blaming himself also makes sense after whatever happened in Season 3. But considering the story arc and the lesser importance of the character, I don't think the writers would go this way. William (Oliver's son) - Small possibility again. Although it would make sense for Oliver to be shattered, Felicity to be sad and Barry coming to support Oliver (since he knows about William); but I still think that William's storyline has been largely unexplored. No screen time has been given to this character and the audience would be mostly indifferent to this character dying. So, coming to the ones I think could be:Thea - Maximum possibility. Oliver's last of family dies, so Oliver would be shattered and full of vengeance. Also explains Felicity's pain and anger and Barry traveling to Star City to support Oliver. Plus, an extremely important character, so the impact on audience would be huge.Roy - You would say how. I say I don't know yet, but this could be a potential way to go for the writers. Roy coming back for a single episode in Season 4 meant that this character is still in the loop. Team Arrow is much too attached with him. This would explain Oliver blaming himself for Roy's death, since he already faked once to save Oliver from being exposed. Barry also knows about Roy, so this could be the reason for him coming to show his support for Oliver at such a time.

My basic practical answer to the question is that there are no specific information security practices that lawyers must follow in order to fulfill their professional ethics responsibilities.Ansel Halliburton's answer references the correct ABA rule, but the case law on what "reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to" client information (ABA Model Rule 1.6) has never been tested as far as I know. The Model Rule and the comments do not specify any single security measure that lawyers must undertake under any set of circumstances. In practice, while some sensitive clients request their outside counsel follow particular security procedures, I think it would be incredibly difficult to make a case that an attorney violated their professional responsibilities by anything short of an intentional disclosure or something akin to a gross negligence standard or a total disregard for client information security. For example, if an attorney accidentally left a box of clearly marked confidential client documents in a coffee shop, became aware of the incident, took no steps to recover the documents, and failed to alert the client that the documents were lost, there may have been an ethical violation.Here are some situations that I have observed in practice or heard second-hand from other attorneys. I do not believe any of these would rise to the level of an ethical violation under the Model Rules, though they are not best practice. My understanding that these are not ethical violations is based on my personal judgment regarding reasonable information security measures, the reactions of other experienced attorneys, and the frequency with which such events occur.Taking confidential paper documents home from the office in a cardboard box (via means of their personal cars and kept in their shared residence with other family members);Leaving confidential paper documents on printers on open office floors or in unlocked offices or conference rooms (though there is usually a reception desk you would have to get past to get into office spaces);Having confidential client communications using third-party e-mail services, such as Gmail, Yahoo!, or Outlook (many solo practitioners or small law firms use such e-mail services);Storing confidential client documents on personal computers or personal phones;Having confidential client calls in public places (airport lounges, etc.); andWorking on confidential client matters on a laptop in a public place without a privacy screen.In all of these situations, the attorneys still may be taking reasonable measures to protect the client information and are not disregarding client confidentiality, but I don't think anyone would view these activities as best practices for information security. I think the acknowledgement of that reality motivated part of the ABA comment to Model Rule 1.6, which notes that some of the factors to consider in determining the reasonableness of the lawyer's efforts are: "the difficulty of implementing the safeguards, and the extent to which the safeguards adversely affect the lawyer’s ability to represent clients (e.g., by making a device or important piece of software excessively difficult to use)."