Erase Sign Form Online

To erase a sign form online with airSlate SignNow, simply upload your document, select the signature you wish to remove, and click on the 'Erase Sign' option. The process is intuitive and designed for user-friendliness, ensuring quick completion. Once the sign is erased, you can save the document or send it for another round of signing.

Yes, airSlate SignNow offers a cost-effective solution for businesses looking to erase sign forms online. Our pricing tiers are flexible, accommodating various business sizes and needs. You can choose a plan that suits your budget while still enjoying robust features.

airSlate SignNow includes features specifically designed for efficient document management, including the ability to erase sign forms online. Users can edit, annotate, and sign documents seamlessly. Our platform also supports various file formats and allows for easy collaboration.

Absolutely! airSlate SignNow seamlessly integrates with many popular applications, enabling you to manage your documents and erase sign forms online effortlessly. This connectivity helps enhance your workflow and allows for greater efficiency across different platforms.

The benefits of using airSlate SignNow to erase sign forms online include increased efficiency, user-friendly design, and secure document handling. Our solution saves you time by simplifying the process and allows you to maintain full control over your document lifecycle. Additionally, your data is protected with industry-standard security measures.

Yes, airSlate SignNow offers a free trial for prospective users to explore their features, including the ability to erase sign forms online. This allows you to experience the platform and determine if it meets your requirements without any upfront commitment. Sign up today to start your trial.

airSlate SignNow prioritizes security, providing a safe environment for erasing sign forms online. We use top-tier encryption standards to protect your documents, ensuring that your sensitive information remains confidential. Our compliance with various regulations guarantees peace of mind while you manage your documents.

Yes, it very well could have. There are two factors to consider here, the first being evidence, or the apparent lack of it and the second being the definition of "civilization".The fact that we have not found evidence to this effect is not proof of such civilization(s) not having existed. We may simply have been looking in the wrong places. Earth has undergone changes in its history: there are researchers who hold that the poles have shifted a number of times and that the polar areas were once tropical in climate. This means that earlier civilizations (like the fabled Atlantis) could be deep under ice, as is postulated by Rand and Rose Flem-Ath.Then we have evidence of rising sea levels, some quite rapid, so that what we seek could be down below the oceans, as humans have a tendency to build near the sea shore. Never forget that only 30% of the Earth is landmass: 70% is ocean ... and we have not fully explored the land. It appears that the Mediterranean Sea was once a deep valley and that a dyke between the Iberian peninsula and Africa was bsignNowed, so that the area was flooded and is now under an average of 1,000 metres (3,200 ft) of water. "Intelligence" does not necessarily equate with "cleverness". We can see in our own time how people inhabit areas with high probabilities of destructive weather and other natural phenomena. Historians hold that many ancient sites were destroyed by volcanic activity (despite evidence to the contrary) and we know that certain ancient cultures  learned (probably the hard way) to build relatively earthquake-resistant buildings.We must also take into account that world-wide "myths" may actually be histories, written down by people who lacked the vocabulary to explain certain astonishing phenomena and visitations they experienced.Proponents of the theory of evolution and creationists alike tend to look only for such evidence as supports their views and both are equally zealous concerning their beliefs, so that they will accept nothing that goes counter to their views.The fact is that we do not know ... and what we do not know may far outweigh what we think we know.Some of the greatest libraries on earth have been destroyed, either by accident or design, so that we no longer have records of any evidence  that may have existed in the past. Another problem that that many institutions, like the Vatican and the Smithsonian have vaults that are inaccessible to ordinary people ... and even to academics, so we do not know what is deliberately hidden from view.Is there any evidence that goes against the current state of the theory of evolution? Yes, there much, but it is ignored, regarded as hoaxes or "killed" by adherents.There is evidence of giants, some with supernumerary digits and double rows of teeth; there are footprints of humans and dinosaurs in the same strata, one even of a dinosaur print over a human print; Virginia Steen-McIntyre suffered much derision and abuse by anthropologists and evolutionists when she found human artifacts that predated the accepted view of human occupation in Mexico by two hundred thousand years; there are skeletons of bearded, red-haired people who occupied North America long before Caucasians are supposed to have arrived there; the same have been found in China ... all these and many more "anomalies" are unexplained by the current, mainstream view ... but there is still worse to come: the blogger over at A human leg bone fossil of 300 mya has definitely identified a human femur that was discovered in three hundred million year old strata. Of even greater significance is his identification of organic material such as bone, blood vessels, blood corpuscles and brain tissue in solid rock, from Earth, the moon and Mars.Could it be that, far from it being a once-off "accident" that occurred only on Earth, life was, at one time, quite common in our solar system and even beyond? A quick tour around what is known about our solar system indicates that something rather devastating happened in the past, which could explain why Earth appears to be the only planet on which life occurs at the moment.The second consideration is the meaning of "civilization" and how we understand or interpret technology. There are different ways to arrive at the same, or similar conclusions, some quicker and apparently more efficient than others ... but, as we have seen, our modern technology is degrading the planet. Did the ancients understand this and purposely avoid it on a large scale, so that we do not equate their advances with high tech? Your guess is as good as mine, but overall, as I said before, humans do not appear to be very clever and it looks as though we are not becoming any cleverer as time goes on. We think we are, but we only have our meagre, often very biased, histories and discoveries to go on and are thus in no good position to judge.

THIS IS SINGAPOREEEEEE:(I'm going to try to avoid the amazing suggestions mentioned by other Quorians like Singlish, enlisting, choping, Singapore airlines, the food etc. It is tough to find something uniquely Singaporean as we have a diverse culture and share similar lifestyles to Malaysians and other S.E.Asians.)The Tissue Paper auntie at foodcourts and the ever friendly Garang Guni man who collects your old newspapers and unwanted items (old school recycling):Burning joss paper in public and along major roads (other countries usually confine it to temples)The Cerebral Palsy Alliance Singapore donation boxes “blue Suzy dolls” in the form of an asian girl (she's blond in other countries and I thought she looked rather creepy):The ice-cream uncle who fixes you up on a hot hot Singaporean day:Seeing people air their laundry in public (literally):Rating toilets:Playing old school games like Mancala, exploding packets, bubble blowing, rubber erasers, the string game, battery powered handheld games, spinning tops and chatterbox:These parking tickets and the ever important TOTO/4D DRAW:The random plate of lohei salad that we eat during Chinese New year made up of auspicious sounding food ingredients that we toss around for fun:Having bomb shelters in every HDB home that are most definitely used as storage rooms:Tearaway calendars that have thinner paper quality than toilet rolls:Smuggling chewing gum from Malaysia:Phua Chu Kang in his yellow boots, singlish accent and his Singaporean qualities. Also most shows on the national channels:Cartoonist Lee Chee Chew’s CHEW ON IT comics:—UPDATES —Ubiquitous No Durian SignsSTOMP-ing (online active journalist website filled with intrusive pictures of people on trains and gross stuff found in food at the foodcourts)True Singapore Ghost Stories seriesBreadtalk, OSIM, TWG, Yeos“Lepak one corner”Large events like beautiful malay weddings or solemn funeral ceremonies at void decks

To teach is to learn twice.If time is money, then saving money is a smart form of saving time!Show me a really “creative” person and I’ll show you a really good cover-upper of sources.Attention is the mother of learning!If you’re smart: you’ll let the other person do most of the talking.In order to become a genius, you must think and behave differently from the masses.Either you control your thinking or your thinking controls you!Whatever works for you is the only thing that works at all.Ignorance is Satan to art!“Because nothing is new under or over the Sun, the genius simply removes the letter ‘k’ from what people knew yesterday and repackages it as new today.” —Genius TurnerToo much bed—makes a dull head.To live life as an optimist is to see every change as being for the better.Wisdom is the child of experience.The simpler you can say it, the better you can teach it.“Imagination is more important than knowledge,” Einstein said. And so, darling, at least put up a vision board!An enlightened person is born twice.The more intelligent you become, the more you realize why: those who know don’t talk; and those who talk don’t know.If you’re wise enough, you’ll find a way to turn your enemy into a friend.Smart people repair the crack now instead of procrastinating and having to rebuild the wall later.Wisdom says: you might as well be yourself, dahling, because everyone else is already taken!GOD BLESS & may all your dreams come true, dahling :)

For dropping some files onto a drive at work and “sneaker-netting” it home, sure, the USB Flash drive is quite good. For long-term storage? Nope. In fact, nearly any other kind of storage will be more reliable in the long term.The Architecture of a Flash CellFlash memory is a relatively recent invention, so we don’t have as much history as you might think about longevity. But enough to know that flash is a temporary thing. This wasn’t a shock or even a problem, for several reasons, but largely because in its initial use, flash memory replaced EPROM (erasable programmable read-only memory), which itself had a limited longevity.A flash memory cell is made of a MOSFET transistor with a “floating” gate. This is a gate surrounded by insulators. To write a bit, electrons tunnel through the insulator and are stored on the floating gate in a process called channel hot-electron injection. To erase a cell, Fowler-Nordheim tunnelling is used.The original sort of flash was retronymed “SLC”, for single level charge. This is what you’d expect out of a binary thing: there’s either a programmed charge on the gate (0) or no charge (1). An SLC flash cell should last about 90,000–100,000 program/erase (P/E) cycles…. some specialized parts can last 1,000,000 P/E cycles.However, flash designers got more clever, and came up with “MLC” flash, for multi-level charge. Now they could write three different levels of charge, plus no charge, to deliver two bits per cell. However, this made the cells more fragile, less robust against corruption over time. More robust “enterprise” qualified MLC flash memories used in more expensive SSDs have a write/erase lifetime of about 20,000–30,000 write/erase cycles. Normal consumer oriented MLC flash memories have delivered about 5,000-10,000 P/E cycles, and they’re down to around 3,000 P/E cycles at the 15nm node. And even more recently, we have “TLC” flash, which puts in seven levels of charge or none, to store three bits per cell. That’s one of the reasons flash memory got so cheap. But you’re going see cells failing after 1,000–3,000 P/E cycles.And here’s the other thing… flash has, for awhile, been getting worse. The highest density 2-D TLC chips may only deliver 300 P/E cycles these days. The wear mechanism in flash memory is primarily due to stress on the tunnel oxide layer in each cell. The oxide layer degrades as electrons, over time, become trapped in the oxide. And as we’ve been shrinking the chip geometries of these cells, their longevity has been dropping. Curiously, when a drive runs hotter, there’s less stress on the insulator, so the overall effect is a longer lived drive… but shorter data life. The 3-D chips used in high density flash have increased longevity and data retention, as they’ve mostly gone to larger chip geometries.Data RetentionSo as mentioned, there’s a charge — a bunch of electons — placed on an insulated gate. That’s your storage mechanism. There are only so many electrons, and over time, they’re gradually going to leak off the gate. At the high end, the specialized, small flash memories in embedded microcontrollers can be expected to last 20 years to 100 years at 25C. On the other hand, Intel recommends unpowered consumer SSDs for data retention of only a year. And this is exacerbated as the drive takes on wear.Now, for SSDs, it’s a bit different when the drive is active. Between wear levelling and data enhancing routines, an active drive will last considerably longer than a year, even the static data stored on that drive. There’s quite a bit going on within a modern SSD that you never actually see, which is designed to spread wear out across the drive. USB drives, though, don’t run data-enhancing routines.And the trend toward less reliable flash has started to reverse itself, at least for now. The 14nm or so node is about as small as a practical NAND cell can go today, even though we have smaller chip geometries. They just get too unreliable. So the larger memories coming out today, 256GB per chip and so, are actually 3D chips using larger geometries. Some of these stack 48 bits worth of data on separate layers, and the reliablity is up.Mechanical and Environmental IssuesFlash drives of any kind will lose data faster in warm environments. Most consumer USB dongles are not recommended for use over 40C or storage over 50C, but they’ll last longer in colder temperatures.The standard rating of a USB Type A connector is only 1500 plug/unplug cycles. This should never be an issue for any USB stick you’re using for longer term storage, as you’d like to use those drives just once. But it’s a consideration if you have a drive you’re using every day. And of course, that’s a rating — you could find your real-world life is more or less than the USB specification.Real World ExamplesYou don’t have to take my word for it, either: a drive, whether USB, SD, or SSD should offer longevity data in the drive’s data sheet. Or in their warranty. However, you’re probably not going to find it mentioned at all for most drives, because the manufacturers don’t warrant data retention. That should tell you a thing or two.Here’s a USB flash drive designed specifically for long life and long retention. This Swissbit drive is SLC, so only charge or no-charge on each memory cell, and it’s rated for 100,000 program/erase cycles. And when new, it’s rated for a 10 year data retention. When at the end of its useful life, though, it’s only rated for a year of data retention. So if you must insist on using USB flash drives for storing imporant things, use a new one and put it right on your shelf. Oh… by the way, the Swissbit 4G SFU24096E3BP2TO-I-DT-121-STD drive is only USB 2.0 and costs $97.58 in single quantities on Digi-Key.For about the same cash, I can buy a PNY Technologies P-FD512ELX-GE Elite-X Fit USB 3.1 flash drive… 128x the storage, and USB 3.1 performance as well. Only one problem: PNY has a one-year warranty for the operation of the device, and absolutely no data retention warranty. None. The JEDEC specifications for NAND flash memory require an SSD in power-off to retain data for one year, in consumer devices, and 3 months, in Enterprise devices, through the life of the device. So yeah, you can expect newer devices to retain data longer. There’s no requirement that the NAND flash memory in your USB stick meet full JEDEC specifications, but major brands most likely do. Those are not the numbers you want, but that is the fact.SanDisk warrants some of their actual USB flash drive hardware for a “Lifetime”, whatever that actually means (30 years in countries that don’t allow lifetime warranties). You would think that might have them offering a data longevity warranty or even an official guideline. Nope, they don’t.Kingston warrants more of their USB flash drive hardware for 5 years, but they don’t have a data retention warranty, either. In fact, they offer this guidance: “Kingston Flash Data Retention: Kingston Flash Storage Devices primarily use MLC/TLC Flash Memory. Data retention on Flash memory is dynamic since the amount of time the memory has been cycled affects data retention. Important information should always be backed up on other media for long-term safekeeping.”And sure, you can hear ancedotal stories of USB flash dongles from 10 or 15 years ago being completely good today. And sure, possible but not likely and absolutely not guaranteed other than on specialty memory like the Swissbit. And the memory chips made 15 years ago were almost certainly more reliable, being both SLC and much larger chips.So, Where to Archive?Well, I’d pick a hard drive over an SSD any day of the week. The magnetic storage on an HDD is extremely robust, likely to last 10–20 years or more, but do check your specific hardware’s data sheets. The problem is, you’re dependent on the mechanical bits of the drive tolerating that 10 year sit. You may be fine, or you may be subject to “stiction” problems, where lubricants get sticky over the years and prevent a normal spin-up.My long-term medium of choice is Blu-ray, with qualifications. The minimum you want is “HTL” Blu-ray. The original Blu-ray formulation starts out shiny, and the laser melts a bit of silicon and copper together, forming a less reflective material that’s stable against sunlight. Avoid “LTH” discs, which use dyes similar to those used on CD-R and DVD-R.Even better is M-Disc, a proprietary non-organic HTL disc using a material engineered specifically for longevity. The disc is even HTL for the DVD-R version, one reason it needs a special drive to burn it… regular CD-R and DVD-R is always LTH…. the laser is making the dye layer clear, allowing the reflection layer through. M-Disc is described as “glassy carbon”, it’s unaffected by oxygen — the enemy of the aluminum layer in a CD-R or DVD-R — and rated for 1,000 years life. Even if that’s an exaggeration, if that’s not effectively “forever” for me, then I’m certain all my old media will be stored in 0.001% of my positronic brain upgrade. But this also points out a universal truth — nothing is forever and under every circumstance. There’s no such thing as “waterproof”, you only have degrees of water resistance. There’s no such thing as “timeproof”, you only have degrees of time/entropy resistance.You can also consider managed archival… online storage. Storing things in the cloud, you will get the slight benefit of enterprise-level hardware, perhaps. But what you’re really getting is active data management. You’re paying that company to mind your data, replace drives (on a RAID, of course) before they fail, etc. I never would have considered this a year ago when I was on satellite internet at 12Mb/s and low data caps, but today I’m on a gigabit no data caps. So it’s an actual option for some.UPDATE: After I wrote this, I did self-examine my former stance on online backup. I was not a fan, because it was slow, expensive, and based on your faith in the company still being around when Godzilla stomps on your house. But I did some research and signed up for a trial backup with a cloud backup company, and then paid the annual low flat-fee. So we’ll see. This service has very little user interaction.Their main purpose is backing up media, not making an archive of your HDD, which is my main concern. So they don’t back up program installs. They automatically scanned 1,882,572 files worthy of backup, at 13,454,758 MB. They have so far backed up all but 25,522 files, but those files compries 10,288,725 MB of data. I started this three weeks ago, and I’m on gigabit fiber to the internet. So the throttling is probably intentional, and not unexpected. Nearly everything they’re achiving will never change at my end, so ones is enough.Now, of course, if Godzilla did stomp my house, I would not relish the idea of spending several months downloading my stuff. This company will provide all that data on 8GB hard drives… so two drives and I’m good. Not terribly expensive, particularly compared to my house and all my meat-space stuff. At some point, I’ll probably update this again.Rot and RedundancyNo matter what you do, you’re subject to data loss. The best archival medium is redundancy. When I store my photos on those pricey BDXL M-Discs, I write overlapped… so half of the last backup goes onto the next backup. Every photo is on at least two discs. And my RAID. And my backup HDD.I have recently added online backup, once I found a service without data limits. But even with a fast internet connection to the home, this can be a crazy slow process. I started about a week ago and it’s maybe 2TB archived out of around 13TB of data. If you’re paying a per-data fee, it gets expensive, fast.While SSDs can show data rot in a few years, HDDs and tape certainly can as well. I shot analog video in 1994 on high quality tape that was showing rot by 2008 (multiple playings on different 8mm decks got it all converted to digital). Some of the old CDs we made in the early 1990s are still good, some of the CDs and DVDs I made in the later 1990s and early 2000s are dead. Particularly for anything using organic dyes, both light and heat are your long-term enemies.Then there’s format rot. I backed up onto TR-4 tapes in the 1990s. It wouldn’t matter if the tape’s good if I can’t find a compatible drive. Or a PATA hard drive for that matter… you can probably still find a PATA interface, but your modern PC may not have one. One of the best reasons for CD/DVD/BD is the fact it’s a consumer format, not just a computer format… that’s the primary reason the discs stayed upward compatible over three decades and counting. But will that last? UHD Blu-ray is out, with 66GB and 100GB discs, based on the same tech used in BDXL, so that is a consumer format. But it’ll never be as popular as HD Blu-ray, which isn’t as popular as DVD. Will we have another consumer optical upgrade? But I digress…So archive often, on different media, and in different places. That’s the only way to prevent data loss for certain. And flash drives are cheap, but not archive-grade. If you must use them, back up redundantly.Read Morehttps://www.anandtech.com/show/9...Dave Haynie's answer to Is SD card a good idea for long term data storage?Dave Haynie's answer to If I keep files backed up on an external SSD, is it safe to assume that without damage to it, they'll last forever, are they safe there, permanently?

I will discuss more so about when people block or decide not to block when they have had serious conflict between each other. A lot of blocking also happens in dating when one party is deeply hurt or wishes to express disdain for the other.Yes, I think that blocking is immature — when it is carried out in certain manners. I personally believe that it is immature when blocking is used in any context other than a person getting harassed or bullied online.My reasoning is that, absolutely, you need to block someone who is repeatedly harassing you without showing any signs of stopping.On the contrary, there is no mature reason as to why you need to block someone. I might give a pass to people who need to tune out their ex for a while until the former party can get over the latter to a sufficient degree. That might by acceptable. But even then, you can simply decide to be strong and not view the ex’s profile, pictures, and posts. It is better to work on strengthening yourself rather than using the crutch that is the “block” feature to help you. You will get over an ex or romantic crush much faster if you work on yourself.I think blocking is generally immature because it does not solve any problems or undo any hurtful experiences. If we define maturity as taking responsibility, being held accountable, accepting blame when needed, working to solve life’s problems, forgiving the other side to relieve yourself, and moving forward in a healthy manner, blocking is one of the least mature ways to handle heartbreak. It hardly agrees with this definition of maturity. Blocking does not:Heal your heartbreak.Remove the other person from existence.How ironic is it that people lie to themselves that blocking helps drive someone out of the blocker’s world. Yet, the very process of blocking is tangible, as it puts the blockee in your block list. Additionally, you had to have thought about them and be angry towards them to carry out the block. Both these reasons contradict the intent to erase the blockee out of the blocker’s reality.The better alternative is to let go and not think about them. When you do think about them, accept what happened. Let the thoughts pass peacefully like air. Don’t block the thoughts or obsess about them. I was given this advice by a very awesome professor I had for 2 classes.Allow you to let go or forgive. The act of blocking is your way of projecting anger and resentment towards someone. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to move on peacefully by blocking a person because anger and resentment cannot coexist with forgiveness and letting go. Blocking is often used as a form of revenge.Allow you to relieve stress. By not forgiving, you hold on to negative emotions in your mind.Undo offenses and pains that hurt you.Solve any problems related to what offended you.Justify or neglect what you may have done wrong on your part. Often times, heartbreaks involve both sides wronging each other. One side hurts the other, and then the other lashes back. Blocking does not erase what the blocker did.Help you grow stronger and more mature as a person. People who rely on blocking tend to rely on blocking so they do not have to address any issues I may have mentioned before.From my own personal experience, I have done and felt much better when I keep my block list clean and empty. You all know that not blocking anyone would be better for yourselves as well, with the exception of constant harassment.I wrote this during my short break from studying, so I can only imagine how much more in depth I could have gone if given more time. Hope this helps. And of course, I mean well here and have no intentions of insulting anybody.

You can check out Hippo Video - All-in-one video platform for marketers. Starts at $29.Here is what you can do with Hippo Video.Import Videos, Record Videos, and EditTrim clips, cut, and crop videos. Import audio and video files, add text, emojis, and callouts. Highlight, focus, erase.HTML5 Video Player & Customizable BrandingBest playback and video delivery for any environment and connection speed. Customize Hippo Video player’s look and feel to match your brand.Generate Quality LeadsMove prospects through the buying process faster with videos. Generate leads through forms, calls-to-action inside the video. Add polls, end-screen, custom CTAs, annotations etcVideo PrivacyShare videos by protecting them with a password. Control access. Set an expiry date for the shared video link.Track Video AnalyticsGet greater insights on video shares, viewership & reactions with performance reports.Powerful IntegrationsIntegrate with Intercom, Slack, Trello, Jira, Salesforce, FB Workplace, Google Apps, D2L, Freshdesk, Zendesk, Gmail. Export to YouTube channels.Collaborate & Manage UsersAdd users, decide user permissions, activate and deactivate users. Collaborate with teams, assign roles and do more.Centralize Videos With CategoriesCentralize, organize and deliver videos online. Host videos in the cloud with our secured infrastructure.Video EngagementYour viewers can react and comment on your videos. They can add in-video comments too.Other Notable Features:Record Customer TestimonialsAsk anyone to record a video by just sharing a link. No need to sign up to record and send videos.Create video from images. Create GIFs & MP4 DownloadRecord videos. Capture screen recordings. Record Audio Clips. Create GIFs. Create videos from images. Download videos.Chrome ExtensionHippo Video is a browser-based video tool that works flawlessly in Chromebook for the benefit of educational users.Dedicated Support: Typically replies in a few minutes.Hope this answer was helpful. If you want to know more about us check out our detailed comparison. If you would like to try Hippo Video, make use of our 14 days free trial.

Yes school shootings are already illegal, no new law will change that. It is illegal to murder. It's illegal to take guns to school. Most of these shooting have been in cities where it's illegal to discharge a firearm. In many cases the kids were in illegal possession of the guns. The guy in Sandy Hook killed his mom to get her guns. Most states have laws that require guns to be locked, when stored in homes of minors. One of the guys had previously committed a felony but was not prosocuted. Most of them concealed weapons without permits. Even waving a gun around making threats is illegal. S...

I do troll sometimes to make people think about themselves, other times to let them realise they are guilible, or to present them something absurd but with similar flaws than their theories, or simply to catch their attention.Most of the time, trolling is just another tool to my Socratic method.Sometimes, I just do it for a petty laugh, but I often feel very stupid and guilty about it afterward. I think there is a kid inside me that likes to be outrageous, to speak vulgarily when politess is needed, to bring tabous like he doesn't care, to catch attention on him, but who always pretends to be genuinely ignorant and acting on pure maladroitesse. I have to refrain from asking question like "Was Hitler a pedophile or had he other sexual orientation than Muhammad?", but once in a while, I coin something that is not only catchy and outrageous, but also is a real question with deep implications, likeIf there were scientific evidence of God, would it still be God? That hopefully  lets one wonder about unfalsifiables and the pertinence of question like Will atheists start believing in God if His existence is proven? After God proves His existence, and that He knows everything, and proves His ownership of the known and unknown universe, would people give Him respect, or just shrug him off? orI think I have written a book that is better than the Quran, what should I do?That hopefully lets one wonder about the validity of the challenge laid in the Quran to make a book that equals it, and of the arguments using it : some Muslims use this challenge to say "you see my book is the most beautiful, this alone is a proof of its truth" while others, when asked whether a books can be better than Quran, answer "simply No, it can't" (What is the most beautiful & logical argument presented in Quran against atheism? , Which books are better than Quran? )So the challenge does not makes a point, it is just a ridiculous call to humility,  and a rethorical question I funnily try to answer with the unexpected answer.So sometimes trolling is a wonderfull tool to catch attention, but it has many other virtues :I can take a position that is not mineI can answer very seriously rethorical questions the undesired wayI can bring assumptions crazier than the assumption made by some other, in hope to show them their craziness, or at least how do I perceive them (not really, I make it just to have fun actually)When answering to dumb/troll questions, it offer alternative to consternation : answering seemingly to the same level yet making a deep and witty joke (eg. my response to I think I found one theory that can explains, dark matter, dark energy and entanglement. My lack in physics knowledge helped me to think out of the box. No experience in paper writing. How to publish, while making sure it remains mine? ). If the OP happened to be trolling, you just share a good piece of laught.