Encrypt eSign Presentation Now

Generally speaking, it depends on the government. But if we're talking about a well-funded state intelligence service, the answer is "probably, if they really want to."The easiest way for an intelligence service to do this is probably not by eavesdropping passively and then using supercomputers (or special circuits) to crack your encryption. Most experts believe that it's easier to perform a "man-in-the-middle" attack.Let's say you're traveling inside a police state and you want to connect to gmail.com so you can send your Gmail password and read your e-mail. How do you know you're really talking to gmail.com and not the evil government? Because the Web site presents a cryptographic certificate identifying itself as Google. (If you did send your password to the evil government, it would be game over. Ditto if they could read your email flying back.)But how do you know this certificate is legitimate? Because it bears the cryptographic imprimatur of a certificate authority (a company like VersignNow or their hundreds of competitors). How do you know the certificate authority is legitimate? Because its cryptographic imprimatur is stored in your Web browser (e.g., Internet Explorer) or operating system, and your Web browser trusts any of these hundreds of entities to signNow that Web sites are who they say they are.The problem is that your Web browser trusts hundreds of these certificate authorities, many resident in all kinds of nasty countries. It's like walking into a store to buy a diamond ring, and the store presents you with a signature from an "independent assayer" guaranteeing the purity and weight of the diamond. If you trust any of thousands of strangers to provide this certification, you can bet that the store could probably find somebody crooked to signNow whatever it wants.Now imagine the store is actually a well-funded nation-state and at least one of the hundreds of "independent assayers" is subject to its laws and not-so-nice tools of persuasion.Similarly, you should assume that several world governments can find at least one crooked certificate authority to signNow that they are gmail.com. You'll think you're talking to Google, but really you end up connecting to the government, which then impersonates you to talk to the real Gmail (and reads your e-mail before sending it back to you).One partial solution to this kind of problem (at least for e-mail) is to exchange cryptographic information DIRECTLY with the person you are corresponding when meeting up in real life, and then use that to encrypt and sign your e-mail, using a program like PGP or GPG. It is also possible to exchange this information through a third party who knows both of you personally, or through multiple third parties; this kind of scheme is known as a "Web of Trust." It has considerable limitations as well, but does have some advantages over the hierarchical X.509 public-key infrastructure that we use for TLS.

>Integration with CCAvenue is possible using their Mobile Integration Kit. They provide sample code for iOS and Android which can be downloaded from here:https://mars.ccavenue.com/downlo...They describe two ways of integrating with their payment gateway, seamless and non-seamless. Either way requires you to redirect the user to a web page to complete the payment process or acquire authorisation from the users bank. Once done CCAvenue can redirect the user to whatever URL you prefer. This could be a website, merchant server API or a custom URI like myapp:// where you could handle the response locally.Seamless means you have the opportunity to present the payment options natively and collect all required fields first, then submit this to CCAvenue.Non-Seamless means you just pass the amount and currency to CCAvenue and the billing and payment details are collected from the redirected page.Either way will you require you to handle integration with CCAvenue with a separate WebView Activity to which CCAvenue provide sample code for.First of all, you need to set up a CCAvenue account. Go to the Sign Up page, choose the Startup Pro plan and fill out your details. On creating your account, you will recieve an e-mail on your entered e-mail address to verify your e-mail. Once you verify your e-mail, you will recieve an activation e-mail which will give you your CCAvenue Account Login ID and you will be required to set your password. Set your account password and make sure you read the e-mails that you receive thoroughly.Login to CCAvenue M.A.R.S Panel (Dashboard). In the Settings > API keys tab , you would get the Merchant ID , Access Code as well as the Working Key. The working key is also named as the encryption key in the dashboard provided to your from CCAvenue. Copy these keys to a safe place for later use.To secure the data transmitted from mobile while initiating the transaction, CCAvenue has implemented a time-based RSA key pair value which needs to be fetched uniquely for every transaction. These files should be uploaded on your web server.To download these files, Login to CCAvenue Dashboard. Now go to Resources > Mobile Integration Kit. Further click on RSA & Response Handling. Download the PHP files from here. You can also use the JSP and ASP .NET files but make sure your web server supports these functionalities before you use them. PHP is supported by every web server so I am using PHP.You will find 4 files on unzipping your PHP download. These are: cacert.pem, ccavResponseHandler.php, Crypto.php and GetRSA.php. You will find 4 files on unzipping your PHP download. These are: cacert.pem, ccavResponseHandler.php, Crypto.php and GetRSA.php. Now follow the following steps:(a) Upload these 4 files on your web server.(b) In the GetRSA.php file, put your access code in the 4th line like this: 'access_code'=>"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",(c) In the 20th line, you need to put the path where you have uploaded your cacert.pem file. For example: curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_CAINFO, $_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT'].'/RSA/cacert.pem');(d) In the ccavResponseHandler.php file, put your working key in the 6th line like this: $workingKey='105B05A21AD102EBA62C051720CC3FA2';That's all for the server part.(Source :: Internet)Thanks.

These are the newest ICOs that are giving away free tokens. To get FREE tokens you need to sign up and you will get them. You will need an e-mail address and a ERC-20 compatible Ethereum wallet, for example MyEtherWallet. Never give away your private key. If you wish to invest in some of these project do your own research, some could be SCAM so be aware before purchasing any ICO around. Some ICO needs you to like them on Facebook or Telegram, but it worth the tokens they are giving away.Flametoken.io (25$) has built Share some, a new adult social media platform that is designed for content creators and porn fans. Share some allows and encourages verified content creators to advertise their pay sites or cam sites, while fans can discover and share new content in their feeds or in topics.Airdropalert.com (1000 SNTR) Airdrop Alert airdrop is 1000 SNTR and it will be distributed in January 2019Griffex (94$) is a marketplace for smart sale and purchase of cryptocurrencies, a flexible trading platform presenting an opportunity for seasoned investors, retail traders, and cryptocurrency enthusiasts at managing multi currency investment portfolio.USDX (10$) Protocol believes the future of cryptocurrencies is to create a widely-adopted token that the crypto-community will want to use for daily transactions in both the crypto and fiat worlds. USDX Protocol makes the blockchain economy more user-friendly and more convenient for the cryptocurrency community — investors, traders, and financial institutions alike. In doing so,Origintrail.io (50$) is a unique protocol enabling IT providers in the supply chain industry quick implementation of blockchain supported data sharing in multi-organizational environments. It is a missing puzzle that helps build transparency beyond the “one step down, one step up” principle, increase the integrity of data and save money for stakeholders in supply chains. The first version of Origin Trail is currently in use in the food industry with the upcoming open source version being applicable to any product supply chain.Konkrete (25$) is a blockchain-enabled property platform. It will allow individuals to crowdfund their home deposits (allowing them to get into the property market sooner) or existing owners to release equity in their homes.Fructus ( 15$) is a project aiming to change the business of fresh produce trade and delivery. Starting in the diverse agricultural landscape of Europe, we see an opportunity to scale and change the world.WeStart (30$) Safe, Simple, Secure KYC for Token Generation Events. Register Once. Whitelist Anywhere. It’s one of the best projects out there in my opinion.Coinbates (40$ bonus) will expand participation in encrypted communications. When a shopper completes an order on a merchant's website via the Coinbates Merchant Catalog using a regular credit or debit card, it receives a portion of the merchant-paid referral fee in the form of designated cryptographic infringement.Medoctor wants to provide its services to any patient worldwide. Everyone deserves proper healthcare, including in developing countries and in remote areas, where healthcare is not easily accessible. MEDoctor has developed an artificial intelligence for diagnosis (which is free for worldwide usage)Qubitica Airdrop Bot (15$) is a new IT company with a community of more than 1000 developers that cooperate and work together to advance in the field of blockchain technology.Invitation Code: QB65482Unification (20$) A Cross Chain Protocol For Data Liquidity Unification is a decoupled architectural framework that provides generalized state channels for data standardization and interoperability across enterprise tech stacks. What this means is, we allow existing apps, websites, researchers, and users to open and close standardized data streams through state channels, efficiently and safely.

Investing and trading in cryptocurrency is not limited to a group of people neither should any profession hinder your chance from making extra buck. Presently. Bitcoin and Altcoins are great investment to make for any smart investors. because mere keeping cryptocurrency can make you money while trading and investing can make you much more.but before you start investing in anything, you have to look before you leap. here are few things you should know before you dive into cryptocurrency trading and investment.Here's What Investors Need To Know About CryptocurrencyCryptocurrency investment opportunities abound, but just how valid are they?With all the loud and conflicting talk surrounding cryptocurrency, how can someone gauge whether to invest in it, or the idea behind a digital coin?Last Saturday, Berkshire Hathaway’s Vice Chairman Charlie Munger told attendees at the company’s annual meeting in Omaha that “people who are professional traders that go into trading cryptocurrencies, it’s just disgusting." According to Nobel prizewinning economist Robert Shiller, “We are over-emphasizing bitcoin.” And JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO and Chairman Jamie Dimon’s view on cryptocurrencies have arced from disdain to ambivalence.While Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETC) are the cryptocurrencies currently holding the first and second largest market cap respectively (BTC $105.3B, ETC $18.8B), there are more than 2,500 other cryptocurrencies according to this list at http://Investing.com. The opportunities abound, but just how valid are they?Crypto Valuation = Philosophy + Technology?Eric Kovalak, a managing partner for Vellum Capital, a hedge fund management firm specializing in crypto assets, says, “People are trying to translate the value of cryptocurrencies into a traditional model where they’d use something like P/E.”While there is a calculation called NVT Ratio (i.e., network value to transactions ratio) that mirrors a kind of P/E ratio for Bitcoin, its creator says it’s “not always” a valuation metric for other cryptocurrencies. According to Mr. Kovalak, putting a value on a cryptocurrency means evaluating the asset against a philosophy and technology. He says investors should ask themselves if the cryptocurrency’s fundamental structure provides a transparent, decentralized solution.Mr. Kovalak says a digital coin should also solve a problem that aligns with the philosophy of a distributed currency solution. For example, digital coin XRP solved the technological problem of allowing Visa- and Mastercard-like volumes of transactions on the network, which has been a challenge for the current structure of Bitcoin. However, XRP operates on a centrally permissioned consensus ledger, not an open peer-to-peer blockchain, and per Mr. Kovalak’s view, not philosophically aligned to the distributed model advocated by many crypto experts.Going Mainstream: “Using Blockchain Without Knowing It”One of the greatest levers for widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies is how easily people can acquire, protect and use them. Just ask your grandmother to pay for something with bitcoin. Her reaction will illustrate some of the challenges to broad adoption. Suffice it to say there’s still a great deal of intellectual know-how required to understand, find and sign into an encrypted portal and begin trading.That said, for believers, the promise of cryptocurrency is its potential to be a first-ever global currency. One cryptocurrency security expert told me, “More than money, crypto is an industry. Imagine you invested in email in 1993 [before browsers provided the platform for mass adoption]; cryptocurrency might be the way to do that today.” It’s a tantalizing thought for investors.The cryptocurrency industry, say experts, hasn’t arrived at its “browser moment” yet. To go mainstream, they say, you would expect people to use a blockchain without knowing they’re using a blockchain—a kind of backdoor “Intel Inside” strategy. The application built on top of it would be simple to use. For example, Brave Software Inc. is offering a browser that allows users to send money to websites they like. What consumers don’t realize is that the Brave browser is integrated with Basic Attention Token, a decentralized ad platform based on Ethereum. And while Brave Software is making the use of cryptocurrency more seamless, pundits and media outlets have given it mixed reviews.Formulating A Crypto Investment StrategyWhen I asked G. Mark Hardy, an expert on cyber security and president of the National Security Corporation, what criteria he would use to assess the value of cryptocurrencies, his answers included:Look at the financial stability and maturity of the cryptocurrency’s core developers and their sponsors.Monitor the consumer acceptance rate over time.Determine if the company behind the coin is solving a particular business issue. With more than 2,500 cryptocurrencies and growing, many simply emulate what an existing currency is already doing.I’ll add this: When PE firms evaluate a privately held company, the experience of the target company’s managers shape any decision to invest. Among the first criterion I’d use to assess a cryptocurrency would be looking at the team behind the digital coin. What’s their experience with encryption, economics, software development, auditing and system architecture?Another criterion is the cryptocurrency’s level of transparency and public statements. For instance, if a company indicates with a news release that it’s struck a valuable partnership with a major company, find out the level of commitment to that partnership. A brand name partnering with a blockchain developer is no guarantee of a successful endeavor.Last year, news of KODAKCoin broke at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES). Through a licensing agreement with Kodak Co., blockchain developer WENN Digital is apparently building a platform, called KODAKOne, using artificial intelligence to manage digital imagery. KODAKOne is supposed to pay image owners in KODAKCoin. According to recent news accounts, and in spite of the early fanfare and bump in Kodak’s stock, KODAKCoin still isn’t available and critics call the KODAKOne platform no more valuable than Shutterstock. In fact, digital rights management experts question the fundamental business objective of KODAKOne.Cryptocurrencies are still new and unconventional. But even with digital coins, there’s a conventional, albeit boring, two-part answer to assessing which ones to buy: First, investors should decide if these investments are within their sphere of know-how. If, for example, someone is an expert on manufacturing and misses an opportunity to invest in a healthcare start-up, is it really a miss? Next, learn about the organizations behind these digital coins and decide if they’re solving a legitimate problem. If so, can someone buy the asset for a rational price and articulate a clear rationale for how it is positioned to appreciate over several years?For those seeking safety in numbers, Mr. Kovalak offers this novel idea for investing in a new and largely untested industry: Pick your top five crypto investments from among the largest cryptocurrencies measured by market capitalization and manage them like your own mini-crypto-fund.Now, that you know something about cryptocurrency, you should not just wait as a bystander, make money with your little knowledge and get a chance to learn more while you make money by trading and investing alongside other smart investors and traders on Home-AlphaOptionMarket.Home-AlphaOptionMarket is a trading platform that trades in classic currencies and crypto. If you don’t understand what trading classic currencies and crypto means, not too worry this write up is just as relevant for you. At Home-AlphaOptionMarket you can earn up to 95% profit on your funds as bodly written on the website but so far so good the least i have earned was 65% profit on my funds and the highest was 87% so in my opinion I think it’s safe to cut them that slack since we all get how important marketing is.What makes this platform unique is the fact that I did not even know jack about trading. I had access to experts who were ready to help and guide me through it all. I basically just had someone trade my funds for me while i still got to learn.Thats crazy I agree !!!!!!After several trades I was able to start making trades on my own and even though the first few attempts wasn’t as good as when I traded as advised by experts, the point is I made profit.All you need to do is go to http://www.alphaoptionmarket.com... to create an Home-AlphaOptionMarket account. Fill in your details and on successful registration logon to your account.You will be required to verify your account before you can start trading so make sure you have a valid means of ID nearby.The verification process is also very fast and you get assigned an account officer immediately.Go ahead to fund your account and the account officer shall be ever ready to give you pointers.Guess what, immediately you fund your account, you get a deposit bonus which is a percentage of your deposit. Awesome i must say!!!!I can guarantee that trading would be a success this approach.Alot of other advantages really and another thing worth mentioning is the excellent customer care support starting from the live chat on the website to emails and customer relations generally. Far too excellent!!!

Those who have card readers at home (to be used with ID-cards) or mobile ID (used, among other things, for bank payments) will log in using their ID to a designated website, pick a candidate, click a few mouse clicks, and done.To ensure anonymity of voting, the hardware used for particular elections will then be publicly destroyed after the votes are counted (the electronic votes are normally taken some days before the physical votes, which sort of gives away some voting tendencies in advance). Still, it doesn’t stop the public from ever wondering each time elections come up about the anonymity and possible abuse of the system. Cases have been known where some heads of households would gather all ID cards of the family (especially old grandparents) and vote for whomever they chose.In recent elections, about 30 per cent of all active voters voted electronically. I know some people who never use this option for fear that records may remain. I personally fluctuate between voting electronically (“Meh, too lazy to go outside today”) and physically (“Elections day, come on family, time to do our citizen duty and have a nice walk!”).Update: just received my new ID card this week, and the envelope with the card reminds me when the next elections happen and encourages me not to waste my vote.

I actually had 2 such events. The first was in Calculus 3 as an engineering student who, back in the 70s, had gone to a high school without any calculus program in high school. Cal 1 was tough for me and Cal 2 was a bit easier but about 2 weeks into Cal 3 - it was like I was instantly one with Cal 3. It was so fascinating to suddenly realize that I could create a math equation for any shape in 3D space and rotate it around a central line or around another line equation and make any 3D shape I could imagine. I started looking at all kinds of plastic bottles and imagining what the equation would be that would define that shape and if I used the same equation but a few thousandths of an inch inside of the first equation I could actually calculate the volume of plastic used in making the bottle. This was too cool. Instantly I started skipping class and still making 100s on all the exams. It was like the world of calculus just opened up before me.The second one was a few years later in Intermediate Partial Diff equations when the instructor spent the first 3 classes writing this massive equation that covered almost every square inch of the black board and he described every variable and every term in great detail. On the final night of this exercise he let us know what it was all about. It was his PhD thesis where he had modeled the population growth of the planet from the time of Noah forward in time. Each variable had covered everything you could think of from disasters to plagues to cures for the plagues to wars of every magnitude and the impact it had on the lost men in a society and the time delay before the birth/death ratio began to right itself. At that time, his model calculated the population to within 1% of the current population. As I reflected back on that it became clear - you really could write a math equation that represented anything BUT BUT BUT you had to concentrate very hard and think through EVERY aspect and every detail and test and retest your results. As computers have matured they do make the math easier and easier but they still cannot account for all the variables. They are still limited to exactly what data we feed into them.

Business - to - Business (B2B)Website following B2B business model sells its product to an intermediate buyer who then sells the product to the final customer. As an example, a wholesaler places an order from a company's website and after receiving the consignment, sells the end product to final customer who comes to buy the product at wholesaler's retail outlet.Business - to - Consumer(B2C)Website following B2C business model sells its product directly to a customer. A customer can view products shown on the website of business organization. The customer can choose a product and order the ...

Could blockchain be an answer to scandal-plagued Facebook?While a “Facecoin” might not lay the company’s many controversies to rest, it could potentially address everything from centralized single sign-on to cheaper payments processing. A variety of different signals point to Facebook getting serious about blockchain and digital currency.There are important counter-trends to [the rise of Big Tech] — like encryption and cryptocurrency… I’m interested to go deeper and study the positive and negative aspects.”Since then, the company has created a formalized group dedicated to exploring blockchain.However, using the CB Insights platform, we learned Facebook has been experimenting with digital currency tech for quite some time.From a new org structure to patent trends, we used the CB Insights platform to highlight Facebook’s blockchain ambitions and the possibility of a Facebook cryptocurrency — FaceCoin.Timeline of major eventsFacebook began its first exploration of blockchain in mid-2016, when the company reportedly taskeda single corporate development staffer with investigating the technology.We mapped out major news coverage related to Facebook’s cryptocurrency efforts. (CB Insights subscribers can run the search here.)Major events include:November 2017 — Early publicity about Russian election interference using FacebookJan 2018 — Zuckerberg’s personal goal for “Fixing Facebook” mentions experimenting with cryptocurrency and encryptionMarch 2018 — NYT and the Guardian publish coverage on the Cambridge Analytica scandal, working with Christopher WylieMay 2018 — Facebook announces its largest reorganization ever, creating the blockchain group run by former Messenger boss (and ex-PayPal president) David Marcus, while also moving Instagram VP of Product Kevin Weil to the projectJune 2018 — Facebook reverses ban on cryptocurrency adsAugust 2018 — David Marcus steps down from the Coinbase board, citing a conflict of interestDecember 2018 — Bloomberg reports that Facebook is developing a stablecoin, or a cryptocurrency pegged to a basket of currencies, for transfers within its WhatsApp serviceMarch 2019 — Facebook acqui-hires Chainspace, which focused on smart contracts and payments, in its first blockchain acquisitionApril 2019 — Sources say Facebook is meeting with VCs to raise as much as $1B for its cryptocurrency initiative, which could helppresent the project as more decentralizedWhat we know about Facebook’s blockchain strategyFacebook now serves as one of the internet’s most important de facto identity layers, with more than 2.5B platform users.Across the web, Facebook’s “single sign-on,” called Facebook Connect, makes it easy for users to sign in to other sites with their pre-existing Facebook login credentials. This seamless user experience gives the company even more user data for targeted advertising.Critics, especially in blockchain circles, note that Facebook’s outsized role has concentrated power — nearly everyone’s online ID is now owned by a single company where the majority of voting power is held by one person, Mark Zuckerberg.Presently, a whole new class of identity-focused startups are aiming to disrupt tech giants’ grip on the identity layer using blockchain technology.So what is Facebook’s strategy?The company’s reorganization in May 2018 was the company’s largest yet, and the most transparent move around blockchain to date. The reorg spawned a new group run by David Marcus, who previously led Facebook’s chat app Messenger (which now allows P2P payments), as mentioned above.David Marcus confirmed the existence of the group in a Facebook post where he stated: “I’m setting up a small group to explore how to best leverage Blockchain across Facebook, starting from scratch.”Former Instagram VP of product Kevin Weil and at least 10 others also joined the blockchain division. The addition of major talent indicates the company could be building something notable.One report from an unnamed Facebook Blockchain insider said the company was making a long-term bet that would most likely resemble its investments in AI:“Rather than targeting a specific vertical, such as payments, Facebook’s blockchain group would provide a foundation from which the firm will be able to target an array of possible opportunities.”What FB could build with blockchain and digital assetsAs Facebook looks to redefine itself and expand its offerings, blockchain could be a signNow lever to pull. Among many possibilities, tech commentators have theorized Facebook could build:Coin incentives for e-commerceMicropayments for services and content creatorsBanking appsExchanges (competing with the likes of Coinbase)Identity techFirstly, Facebook’s massive scale gives it a serious advantage in coin distribution. AngelList founder Naval Ravikant has posited that Facebook could adopt an extreme version of the popular “airdrop” model — distributing crypto tokens as widely as possible to increase the likelihood it gets used as money — as a path toward adoption.But floating a widely-used coin is just the beginning. FaceCoin’s influence could extend into payments, e-commerce, banking, and more.Josh Constine of TechCrunch wrote that a theoretical FaceCoin could kick-start adoption by offering an immediate 3% discount on everything purchased using the coin. Because FaceCoin would be circumventing traditional partners and processing fees, they could pass the savings on to consumers.Considering that Facebook has reportedly asked banks for data partnerships, the company may have financial services ambitions. Perhaps the company could build a branchless challenger bank, leveraging its scale and technical know-how.As Facebook’s blockchain ambitions evolve, it could edge into Coinbase’s cryptocurrency exchange territory, similar to Robinhood. Notably, when David Marcus assumed the blockchain role within Facebook, he stepped down from his position on the board at Coinbase, citing a conflict of interest.In identity tech, the company could build a login layer like Facebook Connect for decentralized apps (dApps), which can have onerous login processes.As blockchain startups aim to turn popular services into dApps, Facebook could gain from expanding its online ID abilities even further. Facebook could perhaps deliver a compelling enough identity UX that kick-starts a wave of consumer adoption.Finally, a FaceCoin could be used to incentivize users to engage with Facebook platforms. With recent hacks and negative press, users might be on the fence about uploading a family photo album or updating a status. But if the company could incentivize users with, say, one FaceCoin per uploaded photo, the company could encourage users to spend even more time on the platform.In any event, resource-rich Facebook, with top tech talent, and near-ubiquity among consumers and businesses, may eventually need a new appeal to users. By all accounts, the company sees blockchain tech as a possible avenue.Patents show Facebook’s longstanding interest in cryptocurrencyFacebook has been pursuing IP related to digital currency as far back as 2007, when it applied for a patent that allowed “giving gifts via a social network and displaying icons representing assets … the assets include real assets, digital assets, and virtual assets.”Of course, that 2007 patent predates even the dawn of the first blockchain protocol, Bitcoin. But Facebook has a long track record of envisioning tech related to digital assets. We looked at patents related to digital currency below.

The question that everyone is asking. In this answer I will collect available evidence and check their veracity. This will be a long answer because I intend to be thorough. Because of this, I have added a list in the end summarizing the claims that have been made along with the evidence for or against them. You can go straight to the sunmary list if you wish.The conclusion will be a rather underwhelming ‘we don’t know’. I am leaning towards ‘there were deaths but few’ but really, there is not enough evidence to substantiate this conclusion.On the way, we will see how to examine news and identify what is well-substantiated and what the journalists may well have made up. My chief reason for writing this answer is to demonstrate how to critically examine news stories because clearly far too many people fall regularly for fake news.Let us proceed then, in the spirit of investigative analysis.The Early ReportsThe strikes happened at 3 Am on Tuesday morning. The first news of the airstrike came from Pakistan side.Indian Air Force violated Line of Control. Pakistan Air Force immediately scrambled. Indian aircrafts gone back. Details to follow.— Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor (@OfficialDGISPR) February 25, 2019 Indian aircrafts intruded from Muzafarabad sector. Facing timely and effective response from Pakistan Air Force released payload in haste while escaping which fell near Balakot. No casualties or damage.— Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor (@OfficialDGISPR) February 26, 2019 An official announcement from India’s side eventually came from foreign secretary Vijay Gokhale. The pertinent points made in the official announcement were:India had struck a big training camp of JeM in Balakot.“A very large number of JeM terrorists, trainers, senior commanders and groups of jihadis who were being trained for fidayeen action were eliminated.”This facility was headed by Yusuf Azhar, brother in law of Masood Azhar.Reports in Indian media added some further claims which were quoted as having come from ‘sources within the government’. Some of the things that one might have read that day would be:1000 kgs of bombs had been dropped. 300–350 terrorists were killed.3 terror camps had been struck.In the terror camp in Balakot, terrorists were living with five star facilities including a swimming pool.Yusuf Azhar was killed, along with several other prominent JeM operatives. One could find 10–12 names of terrorists in media reports.Most reports said six bombs had been dropped. India Today reported four to five, The Hindu reported five.As we will keep seeing in this answer, information from ‘sources’ has to be viewed with skepticism in the absence of further evidence. Already one can see this - despite government announcement that only one camp was hit, various media outlets were quoting ‘sources’ to say 3 had been hit.[As an aside, let me note that the reporting was also very sloppy, to say the least. To give one example, India Today reported:Gokhale confirmed that the JeM terror facility on Jaba top was destroyed in the operation along with some control centres and an ammunition dump. The ammunition dump reportedly had more than 200 AK series rifles, hand grenades, explosives, and detonators.He had said nothing of that kind as you can check from the official announcement.]Meanwhile, Pakistan officials continued to maintain that no damage had been done.First News from groundA Pakistani student currently residing in US tweeted:So a friend from the area has confirmed that madressa Taleem-ul-Quran (it’s board says run by Hazrat Maulana Masood Azhar) at Mansehra (Balakot) was hit, & there are ~10 ambulances around. But the area is now sealed. Local students told him, ziada nahi marai bachatt hogae.— Syed (@gypsy_heart6) February 26, 2019 According to him, there was a Madrasa in the area run by Masood Azhar which had been hit. 10 ambulances were seen. Students of that Madrasa said that not many had died.By afternoon the first ground reports began emerging. The first ground report to come was from Reuters. The report said:Villagers confirmed that Jaish-e-Mohammad had been operating in the Balakot area for a long time. Jaish used to have a training camp which they later turned into a madrasa.This Jaish-run Madrasa stood on a hilltop and villagers said that they were not allowed close to it.Villagers heard four loud bangs in succession at around 3 AM.But none of the bombs hit the madrasa. Villagers claimed that they exploded about a kilometer away from the madrasa.By this time the area about the madrasa had been sealed by Pakistan army and according to reports, not even local police was allowed to enter.A report from BBC Hindi quoted Jaish-e-Mohammad sources who said that they no longer used that camp as a training area and Yusuf Azhar had not been present.This seemed to be the conclusion Western media had also drawn. For instance, NYT reported:The view that little had been damaged was supported by military analysts and two Western security officials, who said that any militant training areas at the site, in the Pakistani province of Khyber-Pakhtunkwha, had long since packed up or dispersed.Later that day, Pakistan admitted that four bombs had been dropped but none had done any damage.Preliminary conclusionsOnly a few of the claims made in the media were corroborated by more than one independent source.First, the existence of a Jaish-run madrasa. This was corroborated by both the Reuters report and the Pakistani student Syed who had tweeted from US. According to locals, it used to be a terrorist training camp. It appeared that this madrasa must have been the target of the strikes.If locals were to be believed, there were four strikes and all had missed. But if Syed was right, then the madrasa had been hit. There was a good chance of his telling the truth, first because he was a disinterested party and second because he had been the first to report the existence of this madrasa which was later confirmed by Reuters.But even if there was a successful strike, were terrorists present? Both Western officials and Jaish ‘sources’ said that they no longer ran any active camps there.Further News from ground and elsewhereSome more information about this mysterious madrasa came to light from different sources.A US Department of Defense memo dated January 31, 2004 that had been leaked by Wikileaks in 2011, indicated the existence of "a [JeM] training camp that offers both basic and advanced terrorist training on explosives and artillery" located near Jaba.Further, an article in Jaish-e-Mohammad publication Al Qalam mentioned an event in the same Madrasa in April 2018. It was reported that Yousuf Azhar attended this event and JeM leader Abdul Rauf Ashgar spoke in praise of Jihadi ideology:The youths of this madrasa have broken the arrogance of the Kashmiri mountains and have lit the torch of Jihad there, and will keep it alight.In the subsequent days, more reports from the ground started coming.There were reports from Reuters, Al jazeera and Pakistani anti-establishment journalist Hamid Mir. All reportedThe existence of four bomb sites in forest areas.That locals denied that anyone had been killed.The nearest hospital denied anyone had been brought there for treatment.These four bombs had clearly missed the target.What about the madrasa? It still remained sealed, two days after the bombing.Al Jazeera reported:"The madrassa [religious school] there, at the top of the mountain, that is a training camp for mujahideen [religious fighters]," said one resident, gesturing in the direction of the school. He spoke on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the subject."Everyone here knows there is a Jaish camp there, at the madrassa," said another 31-year-old local resident, also on condition of anonymity. "It is an active training centre, they teach people how to fight there."Others, however, disputed that claim.Signboard for the madrasa. It mentions Masood Azhar’s name as benefactor. The board was removed by the military.Al Jazeera reported that they had not managed to access the madrasa.The report by Reuters saidPeople in the area said Jaish-e Mohammad did have a presence, running not an active training camp but a madrassa, or religious school, about one km from where the bombs fell.“It is Taleem ul Quran madrassa. The kids from the village study there. There is no training,” said Nooran Shah.A sign which had been up earlier in the week identifying the madrassa’s affiliation to Jaish-e Mohammad had been removed by Thursday and soldiers prevented reporters from gaining access.But it was possible to see the structure from the back. It appeared intact, like the trees surrounding it, with no sign of any damage of the kind seen near the bomb craters.Meanwhile, Western officials maintained that there were no terror camps and the Indian reports were exaggerated.Reuters reports:Western diplomats in Islamabad also said they did not believe the Indian air force hit a militant camp.“There was no militant training camp there. It hasn’t been there for a few years – they moved it. It’s common knowledge amongst our intelligence,” said one of them.South Asia expert Michael Kugelman tweeted:Thanks for the offer :) But I've already seen plenty of credible reports on the ground (and there is also satellite imagery) that make quite clear that Indian claims of killing hundreds of terrorists-or even of destroying terrorist facilities-are spurious if not outright false. https://t.co/gOTVi1y1vp— Michael Kugelman (@MichaelKugelman) March 1, 2019 On being pressed for details, Indian Air Vice Marshall R.G.K Kapoor told media“There is fairly credible evidence with us which proves that there was damage to the camps. We hit the intended targets and caused the damage that was intended. However, it will be premature to say what is the number of casualties we have been able to inflict on those camps and the number of deaths. Whatever we intended to destroy we have got the result.”However India has not released those satellite images. There were some claims in the media that ‘sources’ said satellite images will prove damage done. Again, these are just claims.Ground reports from Far awayTwo ‘ground reports’ came from people far away.Rome based journalist Francesca Marino claimed that she had communicated with locals through ‘encrypted communication’ and reported that thirty five had died. She wrote that her sources were local government employees and could not speak openly.Apart from the questionable credibility of ‘encrypted communication’, Marino is also known to be hostile to Pakistan, close to separatist Baloch leaders and had evicted been from Pakistan in 2011. Without independent corroborating her account can hardly be trusted. However the number she reports is consistent with ’10 ambulances’ reported by Syed.Exiled Pakistani journalist Taha Siddiqi posted an audio clip on Twitter which he claimed was a sermon in a JeM seminary:#Exclusive: In a sermon in #Pakistan, #JaisheMohammad leader accepts Indian planes were targeting their center in #Balakot. He criticizes @ImranKhanPTI for releasing #IndianAirForce pilot #Abhinandhan. He also calls Pakistanis for joining #jihad in Indian-administered #Kashmir pic.twitter.com/j4pQ4WG96T— Taha Siddiqui (@TahaSSiddiqui) March 2, 2019 Transcript:Indian planes did not bombard the headquarters of any (military) agency. Look at the the target of India’s bombs. What kind of place (makam) was it? Was it a place where agencies hold their meetings? Or was it a place where students in the light of the Quran and Sunnah, learned about jihad and helping Kashmiri Muslims as their duty? That is the place where it was attacked.The decision is in your hands. Will you still call it the jihad of the agencies, even when India has crossed from its territory, entered our country and attacked our centre (markaz) and has made jihad a reason to defend ourselves. It is said that when ants are near the end of their lives, they sprout wings and when hyenas know their end, they turn towards the city. Indian ants sprouted wings and flew to Balakot. Indian hyenas’ end is near and they turned towards the city of Balakot. Now it is up to lions like you whether you crush this ant under your feet or hunt the hyena or act like the Niazi rulers (hukmaran).Earlier, a Niazi gave away half of the country and 90,000 soldiers. Today, another Niazi after returning the Indian pilot has turned victory into loss, bowed his head down in front of the enemies and embarrassed the Muslim ummah.Satellite ImageryExperts were able to find the location of the bomb sites and the Madrasa on the map. You can look it up - the madrasa is at is 34.464042, 73.318427 (Google Earth link). (Note: An incorrect location had been identified as the Madrasa in another Quora answer).Nathan Ruser, a researcher at Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s International Cyber Policy Centre, studied Google satellite images from 27th Feb (after the strike) and claimedno evidence of damage to the facility or nearby areas is visible on the images.He was able to identify “three clear impact areas between 150 and 200 metres from the edge of the facility.”The same conclusion was signNowed by Michael Jakob Sheldon, a Digital Forensic Research Associate at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab.The takeaway is that while impact areas were the bombs fell could be identified, no damage to the facility nor any impact area close enough to it to have killed anyone were found by the experts.Final ConclusionsThere can be little doubt that the madrasa was the the target of the attack.Evidence from different sources suggest that the Madrasa was, at the very least, a place for dissemination of Jihadi ideology and a recruitment center. Whether it was a terrorist training camp or not is not confirmed, but it is plausible.All evidence suggests that four of the bombs certainly missed. How could highly accurate bombs miss is an open question. This highly informative twitter thread by an expert tries to shed some light on this.Finally, was the madrasa hit? Satellite image experts conclude that there was no damage done to the buildings or local vegetation comparable to the other bomb sites. Reuters report confirms that the madrasa was seen standing.On the other hand, Pakistan military have still not let anyone in that madrasa. What are they hiding, that too for so long? If there was some material that would prove it was a Jaish recruitment center that could be removed quickly enough.There must be something more incriminating. One possibility would be that there is some evidence that it had been used as a training ground in the recent past.The other is that there had been a bomb strike close to it.My speculation is that there was a smaller, fifth bomb. Not 200–225 kg like the others. This bomb hit close enough to the madrasa to do some damage. Not nearly as many deaths as Indian media reported, but enough to require 10 ambulances as Syed had reported.That’s my speculation, but there is very little to substantiate it. The proper answer is that the evidence is inconclusive.Claim: 3 areas were hit. Supported by : ‘sources'. Contradicted by: Official announcement by Indian govt, interviews of locals etc.Verdict: False. Only one area was hit.Claim: There was a madrasa ran by Jaish-e-Mohammad in the area where bombs were dropped.Supported by: Locals, a Pakistani student based in US called Syed who tweeted about it with info from his friend, Satellite imagery, signboard of the madrasa. (Syed's tweet was that the madrasa had been hit, 10 ambulances were in the scene and local students told his friend that not many had died.)Verdict: True.Claim: This madrasa used to be a terrorist training camp.Supported by: Locals, Western diplomats, A US defense memo leaked by Wikileak.Verdict: TrueClaim: This madrasa was an ideological recruitment center where the message of spreading Jihad to Kashmir was psignNowed.Supported by: Locals, an article in JeM publication, an audio recording of a JeM seminary presented by an exiled Pakistani journalist.Verdict: TrueClaim: This madrasa was still a terrorist training camp.Supp by: Some locals.Opposed by: Other locals, Western diplomats and officials whose intelligence reports suggested that terror camps had been moved from the area.Verdict: UnclearClaim: Terrorists were living in a 5 star level resort with swimming pools.Supp by: ‘Sources' of Indian media.Opp by: Satellite imagery, locals.Verdict: FalseClaim: India targeted this madrasaSupp by: Inference drawn from the true statements above, the audio clip of JeM seminary which directly mentioned this.Opp by: Pak govt claims that IAF fighters just dropped the payload randomly and left.Verdict: TrueClaim: 4 bombs missed any target, including the madrasa.Supported by: Locals, journalists who visited the area, satellite imagery analysis done by two independent experts from Aus and USA.Verdict: TrueClaim: The madrasa was hit and heavy damages were done.Supp by: Official announcement by Indian govt.Opp by: Satellite imagery which showed no substantial damage to the madrasa, locals, Syed's tweet which said not many had died.Claim: madrasa had not been hit.Supp by: locals, Reuters report which said it could be seen standing, Satellite imagery.Opp by: Indian government, Syed’s tweet, report by a Rome-based journalist who claimed to have communicated with locals from Rome. She said 35 were killed. However she is known to be anti-Pakistan.Verdict: UnclearClaim: Pakistani army is trying to hide something about the madrasa.Supp by: The fact that they have kept the madrasa sealed since the blast till date and have not allowed anyone in.Verdict: TrueClaim: The madrasa was hit by a smaller bomb and a small number were killed.Supp by: Syed's tweet, the secretive behaviour of Pakistan army around the madrasaOpposed by: Locals, lack of direct evidence from satellite imagery.Verdict: Unclear.Final verdict: The madrasa may or may not have been hit. If hit, it was either by a smaller bomb or by a bomb that hit close to the madrasa and a relatively small number of people died.(Note: After I was halfway through writing this I found this Wire article which did a better job at collecting and examining evidence. )