Share eSignature Presentation Mac
Make the most out of your eSignature workflows with airSlate SignNow
Extensive suite of eSignature tools
Robust integration and API capabilities
Advanced security and compliance
Various collaboration tools
Enjoyable and stress-free signing experience
Extensive support
How To Set Up eSign in MacApp
Keep your eSignature workflows on track
Our user reviews speak for themselves
Share eSignature Presentation Mac. Check out probably the most user-helpful knowledge about airSlate SignNow. Manage your complete papers digesting and discussing method electronically. Range from hand-held, paper-dependent and erroneous workflows to automated, computerized and faultless. It is possible to produce, supply and indicator any paperwork on any device anywhere. Ensure that your airSlate SignNow company cases don't move overboard.
Discover how to Share eSignature Presentation Mac. Keep to the straightforward information to get going:
- Create your airSlate SignNow account in mouse clicks or log in along with your Facebook or Google bank account.
- Enjoy the 30-working day free trial offer or choose a pricing prepare that's excellent for you.
- Locate any legal web template, build online fillable varieties and discuss them firmly.
- Use advanced characteristics to Share eSignature Presentation Mac.
- Indication, modify signing buy and gather in-person signatures 10 times faster.
- Set automatic alerts and get notifications at each step.
Relocating your duties into airSlate SignNow is uncomplicated. What practices is a straightforward procedure to Share eSignature Presentation Mac, in addition to tips to help keep your peers and partners for greater cooperation. Inspire your employees with all the finest tools to be in addition to enterprise procedures. Increase productivity and range your organization faster.
How it works
Rate your experience
-
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
-
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
-
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
A smarter way to work: —how to industry sign banking integrate
FAQs
-
How are cracked versions of software created and why are developers not able to prevent it?
Cracked versions of software are created with the use of debuggers. (A debugger is a special type of software that lets programmers deconstruct their software into its constituent parts for the purpose of finding bugs, and thus de-bugging. Additionally debuggers can be used for reverse-engineering, or to see what is inside the software, to learn its logic. The latter method is used mostly by malware researchers to study what malware (or computer viruses) do on-the-inside. But it can be also used by an attacker to "crack" (or bypass) legal software registration, or at times, to alter normal behavior of software, for instance by injecting a malicious code into it.)For the sake of this example, I will assume that the software that is being "cracked" was compiled into a native code, and is not a .NET or a JavaScript based application. (Otherwise it will be somewhat trivial to view its source code.) The compiled native code is a bit more tricky "beast" to study. (Native means that the code executes directly by the CPU, GPU, or other hardware.)So let's assume that the goal of an attacker is to bypass the registration logic in the software so that he or she doesn't have to pay for it. (Later for lolz, he or she may also post such "crack" on some shady online forum or on a torrent site so that others can "use" it too and give him or her their appreciation.)For simplicity let's assume that the original logic that was checking for the software registration was written in C++ and was something similar to the following code snippet:In this code sample "RegistrationName" and "RegistrationCode" are special strings of text that a legitimate software user will receive after paying for the license. (The name is usually that person's actual name or their email address, and the code is some string of unique/special characters that is tied to the name.)In the logic above, the function named "isRegistrationCodeGood()" will check if "RegistrationName" and "RegistrationCode" are accepted using some proprietary method. If they are, it will return true. Otherwise false. That outcode will dictate which branch (or scope) the execution will follow.So the logic above will either show that registration failed and quit:Or, if the registration code and name matched, it will save the registration details in persistent storage (such as the File System or System Registry) using the function named "rememberRegistrationParameters()" and then display the message thanking the user for registering:A "cracker" will obviously want to achieve the second result for any registration code that he or she enters. But they have a problem. They do not have the C++ source code, part of which I showed above. (I hope not!)So the only recourse for an attacker is to disassemble the binary code (that always ships with software in the form of .exe and .dll files on Windows, and mostly as Unix executables inside the .app packages on a Mac.) An attacker will then use a debugger to study the binary code and try to locate the registration logic that I singled out above.Next you can see the flowchart for a snippet of code that I showed in C++, presented via a low-level debugger. Or, as the code will be read in the binary form after compilation:(For readability I added comments on the right with the names of functions and variables. They will not be present in the code that an attacker could see.)(To understand what is shown above an attacker will have to have good knowledge of the Assembly language instructions for the native code.)I also need to point out that having a disassembly snippet like the one above is the final result for an attacker. The main difficulty for him or her is to locate it among millions and millions of other similar lines of code. And that is their main challenge. Not many people can do it and that is why software "cracking" is a special skill.So having found the code snippet above in the software binary file a "cracker" has two choices:1) Modify (or patch) the binary.2) Reverse-engineer the "isRegistrationCodeGood()" function and copy its logic to create what is known as a "KeyGen" or "Key Generator."Let's review both:The first choice is quite straightforward. Since an attacker got this far, he or she knows the Intel x64 Instruction Set quite well. So they simply change the conditional jump from "jnz short loc_7FF645671430" at the address 00007FF645671418 (circled in red in the screenshots) to unconditional jump, or "jmp short loc_7FF645671430". This will effectively remove any failed registration code entries and anything that the user types in will be accepted as a valid registration.Also note that this modification can be achieved by changing just one byte in the binary code from 0x75 to 0xEB:But this approach comes with a "price" of modifying the original binary file. For that an attacker needs to write his own "patcher" (or a small executable that will apply the modification that I described above.) The downside of this approach for an attacker is that patching an original executable file will break its digital signature, which may alert the end-user or the vendor. Additionally the "patcher" executable made by an attacker can be easily flagged and blocked by the end-user's antivirus software, or lead criminal investigators to the identity of the attacker.The second choice is a little bit more tricky. An attacker will have to study "isRegistrationCodeGood()" function and copy it into his own small program that will effectively duplicate the logic implemented in the original software and let him generate the registration code from any name, thus giving any unscrupulous user of that software an ability to register it without making a payment.Vendors of many major software products understand the potential impact of the second method and try to prevent it by requiring what is known as "authentication." This is basically a second step after registration, where the software submits registration name to the company's web server that returns a response back to the software of whether the code was legitimate or not. This is done by Microsoft when you purchase Windows (they call it "Activate Windows") and also by signNow, and many other companies. This second step may be done behind-the-scenes on the background while the software is running, and will usually lead to cancellation of prior registration if it was obtained illegally.So now you know how software is "cracked".Let me answer why it is not possible to prevent it. It all boils down to the fact that any software code needs to be read either by CPU (in case of a binary native code) or by an interpreter or a JIT compiler (in case of JavaScript or .NET code.) This means that if there's a way to read/interpret something, no matter how complex or convoluted it is, an attacker with enough knowledge and persistence will be able to read it as well, and thus break it.There is an argument though that cloud-based software is more secure, which is true, since its (binary) code remains on the server and end-users do not have direct access to it. And even though cloud-based software is definitely the future, it has some major drawbacks that will never allow it to fully replace your conventional software. To name just a few:Not everyone has an internet connection, or is willing to upload their data online. Additionally someone’s internet connection can be very expensive or too slow to make the software run very laggy.Then there’s a question of distributed computing. For instance, Blizzard Entertainment would never make “World of Warcraft” to fully run on their servers due to immense computational resources needed to render every single scene for every player they have. Thus it is in their best interest to let each individual user’s computer to do the rendering instead.As a software developer myself, I obviously don't like when people steal software licenses. But I have to accept it and live with it. The good news is that there are not that many people who are willing to go extra mile and search for a cracked version of software. The main problem for those who do, is that by downloading a patched executable, or an attacker's KeyGen or a Patcher, they are effectively "trusting" him or her not to put anything "nasty" into it that was not "advertised on the package" (stuff like trojans, malware, or keyloggers.) So the question for those people becomes -- is it worth the cost of the software license to potentially infect your system with a nasty virus?On the other side of the equation, some developers react very negatively to any attempts to steal their software licenses. (I was there too.) They try to implement all kinds of countermeasures -- anything from tricking reverse-engineers, to adding booby traps in the code that may do something nasty if the code detects that it is being debugged, to obfuscating or scrambling the code, to enforcing all kinds of convoluted DRM schemes, to blocking users from certain countries. I personally try to stay away from all of those measures. And here's why:A) Any kind of anti-reverse-engineering tactics could be bypassed by an attacker with enough persistence. So why bother and waste my time when I can invest that time into adding something useful to my software that will make it more productive for legitimate users?B) Some code packers could create false positives with antivirus software, which is obviously not good for marketing of that software. It also creates unnecessary complexity for the developer to debug the software.C) Adding booby traps in the code can also “misfire” on your legitimate users, which will really infuriate them and can even lead to lawsuits.D) Any DRM scheme will probably catch some 100 illegal users and greatly inconvenience 10,000 legitimate ones. So why do it to your good customers?E) Our statistics show that about 75% of all illegal licenses come from China, Russia, Brazil, to name the worst offenders. (I also understand that the reason may be much lower incomes that people have in those countries.) The main issue for us though was the fact that if we enforce our DRM or add some strong registration authentication, many people that wanted to bypass our registration would simply use a stolen credit card number. And we had no control over it. Our system will use it to send them a legitimate license only to have the payment bounce in weeks time. As a result we would lose the money that were paid for the license, plus the credit card company will impose an additional chargeback fee to our account, which may range from $0.25 to $20 per bad purchase on top of the license cost.F) As was pointed out in the comments, some companies may actually benefit from allowing pirated copies of their software. Microsoft for instance gets a lot of free publicity from people using their Windows OS, the same goes for signNow with their Photoshop. That is a good point that I agree with.So my philosophy is now this -- if someone wants to go extra mile and steal our software, go for it! They went this far to do it anyway, so they probably have a good reason. On the positive side there are so many other customers that appreciate the work that goes into creating software that greatly outnumber those that don’t.PS. Thank you for all your feedback! It makes me feel good that the knowledge I shared is useful to others.
-
Which is the best software for documentation?
Traditional documentation done for most of the products is monotonous and tiring to go through. Users often get confused while trying to use a manual.Moving away from static documentation, products are now switching to ‘interactive documentation/user guides’. These interactive user guides direct a user to perform a task from the beginning till the end.Whatfix provides an easy yet efficient way to create interactive user guides without the use of any coding knowledge.It allows users to Learn while Doing. Whatfix helps users navigate within a web application, getting them onboard, trained and providing them with proactive contextual support.One such example of product’s online documentation could be the ServiceNow documentation created with the help of Whatfix. The gif below gives a gist of it.You can list down all the help topics of your website within a self-help widget. Each help topic is a ‘How-to’ question in itself. When a user clicks on a help topic an interactive walkthrough begins. This walkthrough handholds the user till the completion of the task.Now, here’s something even more interesting.Instantly Create & Export Multiple Media formatsThe Interactive walkthroughs that we built here using Whatfix is a one-stop shop for all your interactive content and a great add-on for your product documentation.Once created, the interactive walkthroughs is instantly converted to 5 multi media formats:Annotated VideoEmbeddable SlideshowPDFScreenshotSmart URLAnd all of these can be quickly integrated on any website/web-app.Quick, Easy, Code-free Walkthrough CreationWhatfix’s interactive walkthroughs can be created quickly, without any hassle, and without any code through our point-and-click editor. A 10-step walkthrough generally takes less that 5 minutes to create.You can also make use Whatfix’s widgets for authoring your interactive product documentation.Multilingual, auto-segmented interactive guidanceOnce created, the walkthroughs can be converted to over 50 languages.Auto-segmentation of Whatfix is yet another feature that allows you to segment your walkthroughs on the basis of specific rules, user roles, pages, HTML elements, etc.These features are just the tip of the iceberg.Further on, these walkthroughs can be tailor-made for you according to your usage, budget and product vision.Want to learn more on Interactive walkthroughs, here’s a useful free Ebook - 15 Minute Guide To Interactive Walkthroughs
-
What are some great online tools for startups? Why?
Startups need something that can give then maximum at minimum invest because the number of risks is always high! We understand all your needs and hence we have got this product for you- PayUnow!Be it any startup: food, automobiles, e-commerce, travel, IT, education or homemakers, this one is for you! It is available for FREE for Android and iOS users. Let customers discover you as you upload pictures of delicacies. To collect online payments easily, anytime and anywhere, all you have to do is share a unique business link or website which you will create with us for FREE! Here’s why you should download the app NOW:It is FREEAllows you to create a business website with zero maintenance costHas the lowest TDR in the market i.e 1.99+GST!Lets you showcase your productsAllow you to add contact details and locationMultiple payment options supportedYour customers do not need an app! All you need to accept payments directly in your bank is one link: you can choose this link for FREE!Quick and paperless bank verification and documentationPayUnow is a product of India’s largest Fintech Company- PayU! Join the communtiy of 4.5 lakhs+ businesses like you! We look forward to empowering the SMBs and give them a relief from the hassles of payments so that the only thing you need to focus is your business growth! We are continuously creating a guide to assist you with the best. Learn how to sign up, edit, share and verify by visiting here:
-
What are the best collaboration tools for startups?
This is a great question! Our team at Scalable Path, of 2500+ remote working developers, are collaborating together, across 90 countries, to build products for clients. It wouldn’t be possible if not for the use of collaboration tools which allow seamless communication.In my experience, the best tools will be depend on your business’s culture and specific requirements - rather than the coolest app with the most bells and whistles. Here are the tools I’ve used:Virtual MeetingsWhen I need to organise meetings with people in different time zones, I use a free app called timeanddate.com to find a mutually acceptable time.For conference calls and internal meetings I use GoToMeeting. It has less bugs than Skype, you can share your screen and users can jump in on a call by just sharing a link.Group Chat, Not Email.We prefer Slack to email. It allows groups to have text conversations and collaborate in an effectively. If you want to speak to select few people about a particular subject than we can create a private channel to enable a group conversation. Alternatively you can speak to people one on one or create a public channel, where the whole organization can have a conversation. You can scroll up the the conversation to see the history of what has been said and you can attached documents and links.If you were trying to do this via email than it would be a mess of many email messages and threads. You can check out Slack here, it’s free to get started. Another great tool that accomplishes a similar goal is HipChat, but the barrier to entry is larger for organizations. Other Tools: 10 alternatives to SlackProject ManagementI’ve tried Asana, Jira, Trello, Podio, Basecamp, Gitlab, Liquid Planner and Pivotal Traker (8 of the most established products in the market). There is no ‘one size fits all’ choice, each has it’s tradeoffs.Do you want something easy to use that requires very little training?Trello, (grounded in the Kanban style of project scheduling) initially developed by Toyota, is a wonderful tool and the easiest to learn. Think of it as digital Post-It notes on a whiteboard. Tasks are progressed by moving them into different buckets (also called lanes). It’s the perfect entry point for teams making the transition to online Project Management Tools.Asana is another great option and works more like a ‘To Do List’. You can set a task and within in that you create to-do-list that is checked off as the project progresses. The customer support for Asana is comprehensive: from thought out tool tips to a help desk with same day email support.Do you want a project management tool for software development teams?In this case you will benefit from a tool that has integrated support for Scrum or Kanban boards.As noted above, Trello uses the Kanban framework, which is perfectly suited for software development. Though it’s simplicity is appealing to small teams, larger teams will quickly outgrow it.This is where Jira steps in. It is very well established and comes with the support and stability you expect from the Atlassian family of products. Jira’s Agile module has full support for the popular Scrum and Kanban methodologies.While Asana, Basecamp and Podio can be used for Software Development, you will find yourself using 3rd party apps or workarounds. Possible, but not ideal. It’s important to note that there are many smaller PM tools built specifically for software development. You can find out about these here on our blog about Project Management tools for software development.Do you want your client’s to be on your Project Management tool?Sharing projects with clients and other external stakeholders can be a great timesaver. But without the correct user permissions framework, it can also be a recipe for disaster.Basecamp splits projects down the middle with a client section and a team section. This is a great way to bring client discussions into your PM tool, while ensuring that the client doesn’t see anything you don’t want them to. This approach also makes the experience more manual, as you have to push specific information to the client. Asana, Jira and Podio operate on a similar principle, where guests only see what you explicitly share with them.Trello’s ‘observer’ feature allows you to give read only access to clients. It’s a less time consuming approach – but it does expose all your team’s comments.Do you have complex tasks?Both Asana and Jira have been developed with complex multi-level tasks in mind. Sub-items can be easily created, managed and discussed.Podio achieves the same objectives but in a less elegant fashion (that really is the Podio story in a nutshell).Trello’s visual UI favours simple tasks – and it does this beautifully. While there is support for more advanced features, these clutter the overall experience. Basecamp has also opted to keep things simple and does not offer sub-tasks.We calculated the prices of these different project management tools at the end of one of our blogs this year, you can see it here 6 Questions To Ask Before Choosing A Project Management Tool
-
Who are some famous historical figures that have known surviving bloodlines in the present day?
Niall Mor ("Niall the Great") or "Niall Noigiallach" i.e. Niall of the Nine Hostages, High King of Ireland, may have the most extensive bloodline known.His descendants may well number in the millions.In the past Irish Chroniclers more or less agreed that the first civilized settlers of Ireland were the Tribe of Dana (alongside the Fomorians), then came the Nemedians, and then the Goidels (Gaeli) otherwise known as Milesians.The Milesians became the main group numerically and culturally. Niall was one of their descendants.Niall was a King of Ireland. He is considered the First High King.Different Irish sources give varying dates:The Annals of Inisfallen say he died before 382.Chronicon Scotorum places Niall at ca. 411.Annals of the Four Masters gives his life-span as 379–405.Chronology of Geoffrey Keating, “Foras Feasa ar Eirinn,” says 368–395.Calvin Kephart ("Races of Mankind. Their Origin and Migration," NY, 1960, p.318) summarized the Irish accounts:# With the advent of Niall Niogiallach, who reigned during 379-405, the supremacy of the overking at Tara became firmly established. He engaged in many sea-raiding expeditions and directed incursions of mixed bands of Scots and Pictavians (Cruithney) from Ireland into Britain. He also established Scottish colonies in South Wales, Cornwall, Devon, and Somerset, and in Argyllshire. These colonies included some Goidelic subjects from Ireland. He died while on a sea raid in the English Channels in 405. All the rest of Ireland (Scotia Major) came under succeeding Milesian overlords during the 5th century. #Other traditions (quoted by David Hughes, "The British Chronicles," Book One, 2008, p.143) say he died on a visit to Scotland, or a raid in France.Niall actually lived. The Irish had traditions and family genealogies. Different families, mainly of local rulers, claimed descent from Niall.The Ui Neill (descendants of Niall) family dominated Ireland from the 500s CE to the 900s. Most of the ancient kings were descended from them.Descendants of Niall are identified by a peculiar genetic marker, M-222 (an offshoot of R1b-L21). This is found all over Ireland and also in southwest Scotland. In certain areas however it is much more common than in others. Its incidence seems to overlap to some degree the frequency of red-hair in Ireland. There may be a connection. It has been recently proposed that even the occurrence of red-hairs in Norway is linked to this.cf. The genetic causes, ethnic origins and history of red hairSouthwest Norway may well be the clue to the origin of red hair. It has been discovered recently, thanks to genetic genealogy, that the higher incidence of both dark hair and red hair (as opposed to blond) in southwest Norway coincided with a higher percentage of the paternal lineage known as haplogroup R1b-L21, including its subclade R1b-M222, typical of northwestern Ireland and Scotland (the so-called lineage of Niall of the Nine Hostages). It is now almost certain that native Irish and Scottish Celts were taken (probably as slaves) to southwest Norway by the Vikings, and that they increased the frequency of red hair there.[Niall according to some sources also conducted raids into Norway and into what is now Normandy, in France.]Studies in 2006 proved a correspondence between families who claimed descent from Niall and the male-transmitted YDNA genetic marker, M-222.A Y-chromosome signature of hegemony in Gaelic Ireland.Seventeen-marker simple tandem repeat genetic analysis of Irish Y chromosomes reveals a previously unnoted modal haplotype that peaks in frequency in the northwestern part of the island. It shows a signNow association with surnames purported to have descended from the most important and enduring dynasty of early medieval Ireland, the Ui Neill. This suggests that such phylogenetic predominance is a biological record of past hegemony and supports the veracity of semimythological early genealogies. The fact that about one in five males sampled in northwestern Ireland is likely a patrilineal descendent of a single early medieval ancestor is a powerful illustration of the potential link between prolificacy and power and of how Y-chromosome phylogeography can be influenced by social selection. Moore, LT; McEvoy, B; Cape, E; Simms, K; Bradley1, DG (2006), "A Y-Chromosome Signature of Hegemony in Gaelic Ireland", American Journal of Human Genetics, 78: 334–338, doi:10.1086/500055, PMC 1380239, PMID 16358217The Wikipedia article on the subject:Niall of the Nine Hostages - Wikipedia says that recently it has been contested that all the people in question could not be descended from Niall but rather Niall shared with them ancestry from someone who lived earlier. Nevertheless, since all (or nearly all) the local royal families who claimed decent from Niall had the same genetic marker then direct ancestry from Niall or his brothers is the best explanation. Another of the claims the Wikipedia article adduces is that certain families named “O’Neil,” and therefore assumed to be descended from Niall, lack the Genetic marker. The genealogies of the families in question however themselves speak of the imposition of adoptions in their lineage and therefore answer the question. The other problem they have with Niall as an ancestor is the time sequence. Some (but not all) estimates of DNA “evolution” require about a 1,000 additional years to find a feasible ancestor. Despite this the correspondence between family genealogies and families with the marker is a statistical reality. Niall either gave rise to these families or one of his ancestors did and he consolidated their hereditary rule over Ireland. Considering the turbulent nature of the Irish throughout much of their history that was no mean achievement.A book by Dane Pestano, "King Arthur in Pseudo-Historical Tradition," suggests that Mac Erca a great-grandson of Niall who ruled in Donegal, Ireland, in the 500s CE gave rise to the Legends of King Arthur. See: Was King Arthur an Irishman?See Also: Yair Davidiy's answer to If the Scots and Irish got their red hair from the Vikings, then where are all the Scandinavian redheads?
Trusted esignature solution— what our customers are saying
Get legally-binding signatures now!
Related searches to Share eSignature Presentation Mac
Frequently asked questions
How do i add an electronic signature to a word document?
How do you sign financial documents in pdf?
How to sign in pdf xchange editor?
Get more for Share eSignature Presentation Mac
- How Can I Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- How To Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- How Do I Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- Can I Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- Help Me With Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- How Can I Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- How To Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
- Can I Electronic signature Utah Plumbing PPT
Find out other Share eSignature Presentation Mac
- Pit 1 instructions 2015 form
- Rpd 41285 2014 2019 form
- Form rpd 41285 2010
- New mexico fid 1 2016 2019 form
- New mexico fid 1 2014 form
- Rpd 41284 2017 2019 form
- Rpd 41284 2012 form
- 2014 pit x amended state of nm form
- 2016 pit x amended state of nm form
- 2015 pit x amended state of nm form
- Crs filers kit for 2012 for new mexico form
- Crs 1 form 2017 2019
- Crs 1 form 2014
- Nm rpd 41367 2018 2019 form
- Mc045g gas tax refund request nevada department of motor form
- It 242 2018 2019 form
- It 242 2015 form
- New york form it 242 claim for conservation easement tax credit
- Nyc 399z 2014 form
- 399z 2015 form