Validate Sign Word Later

A recoverable signature error in Word is often caused by issues such as a corrupted document, an incompatible version of Word, or problems with digital certificates. Ensuring that your software is up to date and that you have the correct digital credentials can often resolve these issues quickly.

To fix a recoverable signature error in Word, first check for any available software updates and apply them. You can also try re-signing the document or verifying the integrity of your digital certificate to eliminate any discrepancies that may lead to this error.

Yes, airSlate SignNow provides a seamless eSigning experience, minimizing the risk of a recoverable signature error in Word. Our platform ensures that documents are processed correctly and signed with verified digital certificates to reduce the chances of encountering such errors.

Absolutely! airSlate SignNow offers affordable pricing plans that cater to small businesses while providing powerful features to manage document signing. By eliminating issues like a recoverable signature error in Word, our service helps businesses save time and resources.

airSlate SignNow includes robust features such as templates, automatic reminders, and secure storage. These features enhance the signing process and help prevent issues like a recoverable signature error in Word, ensuring a smooth workflow for users.

Yes, airSlate SignNow offers integrations with popular applications like Google Drive, Salesforce, and Dropbox. This ensures that even if you encounter a recoverable signature error in Word, you can easily manage your documents across different platforms without disruption.

Using airSlate SignNow for eSigning offers several benefits, including enhanced security, user-friendly design, and quick turnaround times. By streamlining the signing process, airSlate SignNow effectively reduces the likelihood of a recoverable signature error in Word, allowing for efficient document management.

Validating your business idea is crucial before you shell out thousands of dollars into building a product, setting up the business and hiring people. I recently spoke to Sam Hysell, he's worked with the Lean Startup team and now works with new entrepreneurs to help them validate their ideas, you can find the interview here: http://apple.co/1LNPWnM. I'll go into brief detail about what we've covered below.The best thing about the time period that we're living in is that technology has enabled entrepreneurs to able to validate their idea at a nominal cost. It has never been cheaper to start an internet business.Here's how I would validate it:1) Set up a landing page. Before you go out and shell out thousands of dollars on hiring a developer, just see if people would even be into the idea by creating a very clear and concise landing page. The landing page should describe what the product is, how it works (3 clear steps) and a sign up button where someone can submit their name to be added to the wait list. Take a look at http://quickmvp.com you can literally set up a landing page in five minutes that contains a clear call to action. You can even test interest levels based on different price points to see if customers would be willing to pay for your service. This is a great tool to help validate your idea and you get great analytics to see how engaged people are with your idea.2) Find out who's interested and bring people towards your landing page to see if people would sign up. If you're getting a lot of signups your steps closer to validating your idea. With Quickvp you could spend $30 on Google ads. I also like this one tool called Http://flutter-app. I use this all the time to test out new features for LawTrades. You can follow accounts that contain your ideal customers very quickly with a few clicks. For instance, if I was opening up a new taco shop, I can use Flutter-app to follow people that follow Chipotle, or Taco bell since my ideal customers are probably following those accounts. Doing this manually would take forever, but you can do this with Flutter very quickly. Make sure your Twitter bio has a link to your landing page so people know what to click on. If a few days go by and your landing page is getting traffic but no signups then tweak the landing page.3) Make sure you're going to Meetup Events and meeting new people face to face to talk to them about the idea! If you're shy, then you MUST come out of your comfort zone. Just find out where your target customers are hanging out and what Meetup Events are they apart of and go there to ask for feedback on your idea. If they like it then have them sign up. Build up the hype! If they sign up, these are going to be the people that your in communication with as your building out your platform, leave an awesome impression so they come back when your platform/service is ready.4) After you have some signups, I would interview them and talk to them about the idea. See what they like about it and why they want to use it. Make sure you also ask them about their feedback about various price points that you have in mind. Interviewing is key because you'll get the feedback you need to build it out. Once you talk to potential users you can fine tune your elevator pitch and really be able to figure out the actual problems that your customers care about.All of these things can help you gauge user interest for what you're doing and I've seen some pretty successful entrepreneurs implement these strategies. You should also visit http://Leanstartupmachine.com they host awesome weekend workshops to help you validate your business idea.I'd love to hear about all the new ideas that are on this question. Feel free to message me! You can always check me out at LawTrades.

Because Identity Politics got real tedious.Leftist Identity Politics is made up of the following rules:Everyone is oppressed by a mysterious thing called The White Patriarchy.Since actual oppression is hard to find, oppression now includes tiny little version of oppression called “microaggressions.”People can be oppressed by microaggressions because they’re incredibly fragile.Since The White Patriarchy oppresses everyone, all the oppressed people deserve extra rights and privileges to “level the playing field.”The Left has gone bonkers with Identity Politics. Currently, “I am oppressed by the White Patriarchy” is the default argument for EVERYTHING.We are bombarded with constant complaints of micro-oppression and constant virtue signalling. This stuff is non-stop now. Everyone is defiantly protesting their fake oppression.Here are French Resistance fighters in WWII fighting the German occupation:By contrast, here’s someone who is taking on the White Patriarchy for insisting that she has hair. I think the idea is that without the White Patriarchy forcing women to have hair, women would shave their head.I don’t know. But look at the expression of defiance on her face. Take THAT, caucasian males!Here are two people who are anti-fascist. Just like those French Resistance fighters from WWII! The difference is that instead of living in Nazi occupied France, they live in a rock-solid Constitutional Republic, with a Bill of Rights that guarantees their personal freedom.And their president, for good or bad, is a political outsider who was hated and attacked by his own party. Yet the voters made him president anyway. That’s a textbook example of democracy in action.It’s almost like they’re people who have declared everyone they disagree with to be a “fascist” because it’s dramatic sounding, and they lack the mental capacity to come up with a valid political argument. And it’s self-aggrandizing.Here’s a empowered woman who is really jazzed up about how a female imaginary person saved the life of a male imaginary person.Oh no you did dint! (z snap!) Take that, White Patriarchy!Here’s a woman who is protesting against being forced to go back to the 1950s.Looks like she forgot to put the word “the” before “1950s.” So she had to write it in later with someone’s Bic felt-tip pen. Might want to lay off the Zinfandel until after the sign is done next time.Take THAT, White Patriarchy!So now we learn that we’re supposed to fight the Gestapo by using this word “Latinix.”Why People Are Using The Term 'Latinx'“Latinx is the gender-neutral alternative to Latino, Latina and even Latin@. Used by scholars, activists and an increasing number of journalists, Latinx is quickly gaining popularity among the general public. It’s part of a “linguistic revolution” that aims to move beyond gender binaries and is inclusive of the intersecting identities of Latin American descendants.”Take THAT, White Patriarchy!I learned German in high school. German has gendered words too. For example, “Der Löffel” (spoon) is masculine, but “Die Gabel” (fork) is feminine, and “Das Messer” (knife) is neuter.This must be stopped! Help your silverware fight the Gestapo!What about YOU?Are you brave enough to fight the Gestapo by using the word “latinix” and by carrying signs about Harry Potter for some unspecified reason? COME ON, BE A HERO.Comments are welcome. I will not block you, so write whatever you like.But please don’t use “gendered words.” And don’t grill two pieces of corn and two hot dogs side by side with a bunch of toxic men. Also, wait until the charcoal gets hot enough before you start cooking. That way, it won’t smoke so much.Also, I would appreciate it if no micro, pico or nano aggressions showed up in my comments section. Use this chart for reference:

There is no best way to write this answer because the feeling is simply indescribable. To start with, the first glimpse of the Antarctica Peninsula (which is where the swim took place) is very intimidating. No amount of training can prepare you for the magnificent beauty which is in all its glory, so frightening. There is ice everywhere and you ask yourself silently every single moment- how am I ever going to swim here?The day arrived and I prepared myself to take the plunge of my life. We chose a place to swim a night before, based on two main factors- there should be no Leopard seals around and not too much ice in the water. But as we were preparing to disembark from the ship, the expedition team spotted two leopard seals exactly where they had wanted me to swim. So we waited for two hours  and decided to start the swim far away from the place where seals were. This did not ensure that I will not be attacked by them but it surely created al lot of distance between me and them which was the best we could do. Through out the swim, the team was on constant surveillance of the area to know the whereabouts of those seals. At 5:05pm (antarctica time) I started my swim, aiming to create a new world record. To my surprise, the first reaction of my body hitting the 1 degree celsius water was not hyperventilation, but the aversion to extreme saltiness. The water was very salty and my discomfort was heightened also because the last swim I had done in a sea was 4 years back. To be honest, for the first 5 minutes I thought that I was not going to make it.  But then I remembered the words from a poem that a friend had sent me before I left for this expedition, "Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit, its when things seem worst that you must not quit." So repeating these words like a Mantra, I continued to swim. And as if the universe was trying to validate my efforts and acknowledge my pain, I saw a penguin swimming beside me. It was to my left and often came right in front of me making me smile. Trust me when I say that in a situation like these, where you are fighting the fight of your dreams as if your entire existence depends on it, if you see something as cute as penguin, you will end up taking it as a sign to go on with all your might. Its not everyday that a penguin comes to cheer you up.So I continued and 41.14mins later, when I made the decision to end the swim, my team pulled me out on the Zodiac and tried their best to keep me awake. I was hypothermic and they rushed me the cruise ship where my recovery process started which lasted for 3 hours. So it was only after 3 hours later, that I came to know that I had made the world record of being the youngest swimmer in the world to swim in Antarctica and also the longest distance ever swam there- 2.28Kms.The feeling you ask? It was sheer bliss. Not happiness, not pleasure, not joy but BLISS. The entire journey was so difficult starting right from the logistics to arranging sponsors to practicing in ice cold water every day. But it was all worth it. Not only because it is a world record but it was my dream. And it came true. No matter what your dreams are, however big or small, you will experience this what I am feeling when you work for them and see them coming true.I recovered after 3 hours and went straight to the dining hall of the ship to my small family of 150 people onboard to be welcomed by a standing ovation.So it was pretty awesome to break a world record in Antarctica.Thanks for asking :-)

I can’t stand videos on scientific topics, so I read his paper.It’s here: Run Ze Cao - The Great Mistake - RelativityHere’s a quick overview of the first few pages: they contain the pattern he proceeds to repeat several times.Page 1: A statement of purpose, and a reasonably accurate statement of the two principles of special relativity (the Relativity Postulate and the Light Postulate). Then a disconcerting sign: he puts forward the Eddington 1919 observations as the only experimental evidence for the theory, without apparently knowing:a) that there are hundreds of experimental tests for special relativityorb) that the Eddington observation is not amongst them, since it is evidence for GR, not SRPage 2: Blather. A load of boasting about how unique he is, and that he doesn’t expect people to instantly realise that relativity is wrong, but that it’ll take some time.Page 3–8: He sets up some simple thought experiments, and then — sigh — objects that the Light Postulate conflicts with his common sense. There’s a lot of self-inflicted confusion going on in the course of pp. 3–5 (the example he uses comes loaded with a large number of unnecessary elements). But the crux comes on page 5–6 where he notes that following the Light Postulate would mean that two co-located, co-moving observers would disagree on the simultaneity or not of the emission of two light pulses. He claims that this is self-evidently false, and so the Light Postulate must be violated.In the next few sections, he simply repeats this same trick over and over: present a situation from a relativity text-book. Find something counter-intuitive, claim that this is a contradiction, rinse and repeat. (E.g., pages 8–11: adds in multiple pulses of light, and a few pages later he meets a point where he thinks everything looks strange, and so concludes again that the Light Postulate is not valid. Or page 11–15: which is a very badly sketched version of the Twin Paradox. The word “obviously” is used a lot.)OK, time to return again to the logic of Einstein.He put forward two postulates.He followed through their consequences (no matter how counterintuitive they seemed).Over time, we found that these consequences matched experiment.In contrast the logic of Run Ze Cao is to:Copy the same two postulates.Follow through their consequences until he gets uncomfortable.State that his discomfort shows the two postulates cannot both be true. Ignore experiment.So, no, this is not a falsification of Einstein’s Relativity. It is an objection that when you follow through the Principle of Relativity and the Light Postulate there are consequences that Run Ze Cao finds counterintuitive.This is no doubt true. They are consequences that many people find counterintuitive.But this doesn’t mean you can cross out “counterintuitive” and put in “contradictory”. Particularly not when all the experimental evidence suggests that Einstein was right to follow them through to the end.

1. A friend had an idea she thought she should patent, and it seemed a good idea to a lot of people. But instead of getting her own patent, she contacted one of those companies that advertises for “inventors”. She soon brought me a 27 page contract of small print that she thought promised her legal assistance for the patent and all kinds of testing, design refinement, product development, manufacturing, advertising and promotion, and distribution of the product based on her d [ http://design.It ]esign. This assistance only cost $12,000, but that was 20 years ago and they guaranteed success. What it didn’t do was define success or any other term in the document, and on page 26, when you were brain dead from reading an infinity of detailed nonsense, it said the services and guarantees would be provided by third parties - unnamed third parties who weren’t signing the contract anyway; so no one was guaranteeing anything. The contract also actually stated that she would have to do everything herself and that the company was responsible for nothing. She was so excited, she had been ready to sign and send her $12k 2. I was in a writer’s group and a member who had left the priesthood and was writing a book about it asked me to review his contract, this one 26 pages. The contract was similar to the one above. For $12,000 the company would provide an agent, an editor, printing, publication and distribution. Minimum sales of $50,000 were guaranteed if he, the author, complied with all requirements. , Near the end was a paragraph stating again that sales of a minimum of $50,000 were guaranteed if he himself sold $50,000 worth of books. They recommended that he go around the country from small independent bookseller to bookseller and set up a web site to sell it. 3. Another friend asked me to read a lease before she signed. She was opening a restaurant, and the lease said she would be liable for the HVAC. I pointed out that tenants are responsible for utilities, but it is rare that they are responsible for any systems of the facility. That’s the landlord’s responsibility. Even most states’ laws say so. I told her I suspected the HVAC system was undependable and she was being set up. And it was not reasonable in a 2 -year-lease for her to have to repair a major component/system of the building, anyway. She wanted this place so badly that she signed without even questioning it. Less than 6 months later, she had to replace the entire system, including replacing ductwork, damage in ceilings, and much more. Over $12,000, I don’t remember exactly how much. A hard blow to a new business. And the repairman who pronounced the HVAC unit dead and impossible to resurrect told my friend it was “ancient” and said the owners had to know it was on its last legs for a long time. 4. In a real estate closing, the mortgage document said, again near the end of an infinity of boring detail, that the buyer could not pay off the mortgage early. Not early like in less than 30 years. What?? Even the other party’s lawyer also had a fit about that. What’s wrong is wrong. But the poor buyer had just come from 1,000 miles away with kids and the moving van idling in the parking lot. He wanted to sign it, even though he intended to move again in 2 or 3 years. It took both lawyers to convince him how dumb that would be. 5. In business I have noticed no one reads contracts, leases, or other legal documents and it often appears their lawyers don’t either. It’s so dangerous. We should read every mind-numbing line carefully. Or get our lawyers to. It would be a lot cheaper than a major misstep.

This is what happened with me when I was working on my last job,The very sweet couple comes in looking for a bath tub and walls. I showed them different choices that they have available to them.My store was changing the banner so we were honoring the deals from both banners. However this created the problem sometimes as they conflicted each other.For example,This couple points out to the sign which said 15% off everything regular priced items. They also showed me to another sign which said 25% off on bath tubs and walls.They asked me which one was going to be applied on their transaction.I said “usually the customer gets the best deal available to them so they should get 25% off on your purchase.”They said they didn't have had the truck to transport the items they were looking for. They would be back.They returned and I retrieved the product for them. They went to the cash register and had an issue with the deal.MOD calls me and she asked me did you say that they will get 25% off?Me: yeahMOD: why would you do that?Me: well, that's the usual practice of the retail.MOD: no it doesn't work that way here so you are going to come with me and “apologize” to the couple.I was like are you fucking kidding me?MOD and me walks to the couple.Me: sir, I have heard that you have ran in the issue. I have been notified that customer doesn't get to choose the offer. I didn't know that so YES, I HAVE PROVIDED YOU THE WRONG INFO. I AM SORRY.”guy to MOD: look, I have been going back and forth for this item. It would be great if you would honor the promise made by your employee.now, MOD wanted me to take over the conversation but I was with the customer as it's not their fault if we have two conflicting signs. I just stood her and MOD tried so many times to direct the guy's attention to me.Somehow the couple knew that I was with them so they kept arguing with the MOD.UTTER INCOMPETENCE:Look, in retail business you always treat your customers with respect and be flexible especially when they have been respectful to you even when it's the business fault.She should have knew that she could have easily make the adjustment. Every MOD has power to negotiate the price point with the customer. Customer wasn't getting a huge discount as it was mere 10% more discount than the original deal.They would have got the deal with 25% off if they had gone to the fully functional store with a new banner. We had cleared out millions of dollars worth of items by offering 25, 50, 75 and 90% off depending on the stage of the liquidation of that perticular department.For me,If you can't figure that out, you do not deserve to be MOD. my store didn't make profit on individual items but we are more focused on overall margin of the transaction.Secondly,She failed me as her employee. As a liquidating store it's awful to make one of your employee apologize in front of everyone for mere 10% discount.She didn't had to create a scene about it and make me apologize for choosing to give the benefit to the customer.Anyway,Couple decided to go with 15% deal as they needed the product and didn't have had the Patience to deal with the crappy MOD.once, they done. I apologized again and they said “sir, you have gave us great service and we don't want you to get into any kind of trouble. We are sorry to drag you in this. You are simply just doing your job.”Me: “ thank you.”…………..Couple days our store manager did tell us in our morning meeting thatIf two signs contradicts each other, the customer gets the best deal.I looked at the MOD and was like “bitch! Fucking listening. You simply wasted your 15 years of “experience of retail.”It felt good and if I was the MOD, I would have given them 50% simply for being civilized about the whole thing.

The rec letter would read: "I highly recommend the applicant except…"Here's a secret: in many colleges, graduate candidates get to see their entire file after they've been accepted into a graduate program. Despite the fact that we sign away our rights to read the recommendation letters, your grad school often does not comply with that confidentiality agreement.When I was in grad school I had the opportunity to work with some incredible professors. One day I was having a beer with a highly-revered professor in my discipline.She happened to be one prof who had not accepted me when I was applying to enter the program. I got accepted anyway, under a different prof who was actually MUCH more appropriate because of our shared research interests. So no harm done.After I'd spent a year in the grad program, and the lady prof saw my work, she openly admitted that she regretted rejecting me as a student. That was nice validation.At the same time I was applying for a grant. So I asked her for a recommendation letter, and she said yes.Emboldened, after a couple beers I asked: what would prevent you from writing a recommendation letter for a candidate? (Translated: why would you reject someone?)She easily answered that she'd never write a recommendation letter unless she could fully endorse the candidate, without reservations. (My brow furrowed as I tried to comprehend her reasoning.)What she meant: she would never write a recommendation letter for a candidate that she couldn't fully, 100% endorse. She explained: By writing the letter she was putting her reputation on the line. If she had any misgivings about endorsing the candidate then she'd flat refuse to write the recommendation.In other words, you could always trust this prof to fully endorse you. If she agreed to be on your side then she'd always have your back.That's some solid advice, and I've always followed it.That's someone with integrity.On the other hand, a couple years earlier, during my senior year undergrad, I asked a very close professor to write a recommendation letter for me to apply for grad schools. He willingly obliged. He knew my goals, but oddly I got a B in his class.A few years later, while in grad school I was given access to my application file. I got to read his recommendation letter. He described me as smart, but immature. He said I deff needed to improve my research skills. His words and overall assessment were unkind. Basically, he would have flunked me if given the opportunity.By his words He gave the impression that I wasn't ready for grad school… even though he knew it was my dream to attend this college. (Meanwhile he was building off my undergrad thesis research and later published results with another student.)Clearly, I'd have asked someone else for a recommendation letter if I'd known what he was gonna say in advance.Integrity is very valuable.

You should not believe what is written in the Vedas. True. You should not believe anything, in fact! You should only go by your own experience.Fortunately, Vedas do not psignNow you to believe in something (anything) as a precursor, that cannot be questioned on logical basis or can not be brought into your own experience for verification and validation. Compare this statement to those which are rooted in “belief systems”.For instance:If you do not believe that there is a God (with a big capital G) and he created the world, you cannot go further in any Abrahamic belief systemIf you do not believe that there is an original sin and there is a judgement day, you cannot go further in Christian belief systemIf you do not believe that the creator does not have any limbs but yet he can hear the prayers, you cannot go further in Islamic belief system.If you do not believe that Mohammad is the messenger of divine message, and he is the final one in a chain, you cannot go further in Islamic belief system.Can any claim of the judgement day or original sin or proof of the listener of Salat be validated & verified right here on earth while you are alive before you die? You can only speculate, or put in more appealing words - trust/believe.On a stark contrary, the Vedas are sign boards only giving direction signs. They do not have any belief system. They do not force you to a belief system. You are at your 100% free will whether to take them, or ignore them, or debate them (in standard logical tarka & mīmamsa methods), or outright reject and form your own religion. All are okay. You will not be burned for blasphemy or threatened that someone will judge you and punish you till eternity.When you drive to a destination, you see sign boards. Sign boards have these distinct qualities:They are for a definite purposeThey are real, however, their reality is for the sole purpose of guiding you. As long as you are driving (or wandering, or lost in nowhere, to be more direct), you need them more and more. In your destination, they have no use.They are planted there by other humans who knew the directions. They knew all the possible ways from where you stand, and which leads to where.Those who made the sign boards surely know something better than you regarding the direction, so to help you, before you arrived there, they placed guidance sign boards. They have thought through elaborately on where to place which sign board, of what size. They have invested their time & energy for you.The directions are not made from simple co-travelers who knew bits of the road. They are not randomly placed on the road. They are designed by those who knew the full terrain and traveled in the surroundings several times back and forth all the way till the final destination (or dead end) of each road.They are not made through guesswork. They are precise, with quantified distances and extent of turns needed.The knowledge from the directions can be re-adopted to the 21st century, for its not in its words or no one dictated a book to you. You can build an Android map app with animations & visualizations, but the underlying knowledge they use about the roads, intersections, exits will be the same. Whether you preserve the directions as a word of mouth, or write it in stone, or print it in books, or mobile apps, the knowledge is same. It never expires so long as the roads exist.Quoting from Yogi Ramacharaka’s 1903 published book 14 Principles of Yogic Philosophy:This is the way; enter upon it, and on the path you will find the things of which I have taught you; handle them, weigh them, measure them, taste them, and know for yourself. When you signNow any point of the path you will know as much of it as did I or any other soul at that particular stage of the journey; but until you signNow a particular point, you must either accept the statements of those who have gone before or reject the whole subject of that particular point. Accept nothing as final until you have proven it (yourself); but, if you are wise, you will profit by the advice and experience of those who have gone before. Every man must learn by experience, but men may serve others as pointers of the way. At each stage of the journey it will be found that those who have progressed a little further on the way have left signs and marks and guideposts for those who follow. The wise man will take advantage of these signs. I do not ask for blind faith, but only for confidence until you are able to demonstrate for yourselves the truths I am passing on to you, as they were passed on to me, by those who went before.When it comes to knowledge-based questions (like, the whereabouts of something), even you give only direction signs, you don’t pass on a belief to others.Let me ask you: While you are seated in an air-conditioned closed space on 18th floor of a building in a dense city, if I come to you and ask “What is Moon? Where can I find Moon?”, will you give me the coordinates of the moon or guiding direction signs as a knowledge capsule that I can use to know it myself? No one can give coordinates of the moon as there is no GPS location for the moon in outer space. There is no absolute location. Everything is relative location from where you see it. So you’ll first give a negation direction like “These walls are not the moon. These objects in the room are not moon. This illuminating LED bulb is not the moon. You can not see Moon from here as it is obscured by all these walls. Moon is right above you but in order to see it you need to go to a clear place” then you’ll guide me to where to go: “Go to the terrace 64th floor. As this is the tallest building in the city, chances are that nothing will obscure you. Look up and find the brightest and largest object. That would be the Moon”. You did not say “I’ve seen the moon and you must believe what I say”. You did not say “I will describe the moon and you take my words. Pass these on to generations on how moon looks like. Centuries later when the language itself changes, you folks figure out what I meant in my words”. You did not do any of these, which you can call as passing on a belief. What you did is transfer your knowledge about something that you experienced as a direction guidance to me so that I can also experience the same in my first hand experience. Until I go out and see the moon, it is neither your belief imposed on me nor a religiously-binding dogma that you need to take. Once I see the moon myself, no one need to describe what moon is to me, or inculcate fear that there is a moon and I must believe in its existence.Vedas give similar direction signs for the eternal questions of mankind, like:Who am I?What is the world around me? What is my relation to it? Did someone make it? Did it evolve? Out of what? How?How to be happy? How to be prosperous?How to be free? What is death? What happens beyond death? How did I come here?Why do these untoward situations happen in life? What can I do to remove them? What can I do to avoid them?How to gain knowledge in the fastest accelerated manner? How much knowledge can be gained? What is Infinite?How is rain raining? How are trees growing? Is there co-relation between various events to a single root cause of the nature & world from which everything can be explained?Is it possible to defy death?Which lifestyle is most conducive to success in life?Why are there rules & mathematical patterns throughout anything we can see in nature?What is Consciousness?What is Life?To give an indication of what Vedas do as sign boards for your life, I made these illustrations:Note: These illustrations are just to give an idea of what type of directions Vedas would give for your journey called LIFE. DO NOT think that Vedas are books with traffic signs in them!!